Tirant lo Blanch; a study of its authorship, principal sources and historical settingVaeth, Joseph Anthony
History
Tirant lo Blanch; a study of its authorship, principal sources and historical setting
Vaeth, Joseph Anthony
Martorell, Joanot, -1468. Tirant lo Blanch
But before going to Anatolia he felt it his duty to take leave of Xor
Miqueli, who was at Adrianople, five _jornadas_ from the imperial city.
His wife and her mother, knowing the hatred that the emperor’s son
bore him, warned him not to go there, but he went in spite of their
pleadings. Xor Miqueli came out to meet him and showed him much honor.
Apparently the fears of his wife and her mother were unfounded. But on
the seventh day of his visit Gircon, the chief of the Alanos, entered
the palace, and at the behest, or at least with the consent, of Xor
Miqueli, put a tragic end to the heroic career of Roger de Flor, Caesar
of the Empire.
* * * * *
Now let us see what striking resemblances we can discover in comparing
the careers of Tirant lo Blanch and Roger de Flor. The points of
similarity that stand out prominently in the comparison of these heroes
are the following: Tirant, like Roger de Flor, came from Sicily to the
aid of the ill-faring empire; both were immediately placed in command
of the imperial forces, Tirant with the title of Capita Major and Roger
de Flor with that of Magaduch; both were always victorious on the field
of battle, and recovered the territory that had been conquered by the
Turks; both were made Caesar of the Empire for their distinguished
services; Roger was assassinated at Adrianople, and in that same city
Tirant’s fatal malady seized him.
The historical basis of Tirant’s career at Constantinople is evidently
furnished by the _Chronica_, but Martorell’s hero differs very much
from the Catalan hero. The author evidently had the latter in mind
to some extent, but apparently he did not wish to portray him in
such manner that one would recognize him. While we still have Guy of
Warwick’s career at Constantinople fresh in mind, do not the details of
Tirant’s career seem to be more in accord with the English hero’s than
with those of Roger de Flor? Did we not expect more of a resemblance,
when we were told that Tirant represents the latter? In short, is
that judgment not misleading? If it had been Martorell’s intention to
make this part a kind of historical novel in which Roger de Flor was
to be the central figure, would he not have adhered to the facts more
closely, and elaborated them at his own free will and pleasure?
CHAPTER IV
OTHER MATERIAL FROM THE _CHRONICA_ UTILIZED BY MARTORELL
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account