To Mesopotamia and Kurdistan in disguise : $b with historical notices of the Kurdish tribes and the Chaldeans of KurdistanSoane, Ely Banister
History
To Mesopotamia and Kurdistan in disguise : $b with historical notices of the Kurdish tribes and the Chaldeans of Kurdistan
Soane, Ely Banister
Iraq -- Description and travel; Kurdistan -- Description and travel; Tigris River Valley -- Description and travel
In A.D. 410 the great dissension between Nestorius, Patriarch of
Constantinople, and St Cyril, upon various points of doctrine, arose,
and resulted in the split which gave birth to the new sect called
the Nestorians. Throughout the controversy--resulting in the General
Council at Ephesus in 431--Nestorius had been supported by the Eastern
Bishops, and it was natural that after the rupture, the Chaldeans, who
sent them, should join the ranks of, or rather become themselves, the
Nestorians.
The doctrines of Nestorius were not by any means novel, nor, to those
who would regard Christianity as a whole, sufficiently important to
cause a split, or occasion such venom as has unfortunately always been
characteristic of the militant sectaries of the religion of peace.
The Bishop of Tarsus, Diodorus, had already promulgated Nestorius’
doctrines among the Western Assyrians, and as they were gradually
accepted, their upholders gained the name of the Persian party, partly
because of the situation of the new sect, and partly on account of the
sympathy of the Persian kings.
From this time the tenets of Nestorius, stamped out in Syria and
western Asia, became exclusively identified with the Chaldean nation,
and the first existence of the Nestorian Church or Assyrian Church
began about A.D. 450, or earlier.
From now till the advent of Muhammad, the Church may be said to have
prospered. It had vicissitudes certainly, for it was not in such a
position as to dictate to rulers and kings. It is, again, a sorry
feature of Christianity that we are told that during that time all the
persecution they suffered was from the Christian Byzantine Empire, and
all the sympathy and protection they obtained from the Zoroastrian
monarchs of Persia.
Among these stands out the exception of Kawad, king of Persia, who is
described by Chaldean priests of the period as a monster; war also did
its work in harassing the Church, but we have no reason to believe that
it did not harass the idolaters as well, for the Persians, whose armies
continually scourged Mesopotamia, were not admittedly of the religion
of any of the invaded peoples, while inclining to the doctrines of
Christianity, as we have seen already.
During these times the great college of Edessa (Urfa), which the
Isaurian Zeno had closed on account of its Nestorian doctrines, was
transferred to Jund-i-Shapur, near the modern Shushtar, in Elam, into
Persian territory, for there the Chaldeans were sure of protection
and sympathy from a people whose talent has ever been for literature
and learning. And the hope of the exiled priests was well justified.
The place of exile became a cherished home, and the medical college
of Edessa grew at Jund-i-Shapur to a great missionary and educational
centre.
[Sidenote: NUSHIRVAN THE JUST]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account