To-morrow and to-morrow ... a novelMcKenna, Stephen
History
To-morrow and to-morrow ... a novel
McKenna, Stephen
Great Britain -- History -- George V, 1910-1936 -- Fiction; Man-woman relationships -- Fiction; Spouses -- Fiction
“I had to cancel leave all round,” he explained, as we left our
dismantled house for dinner at the Eclectic. “Now that the
peace-treaty’s out of the way, the government is looking for fresh
triumphs. Happy thought: an Irish policy! I felt it was time for us to
define our attitude.”
“Hasn’t it been defined for us,” I asked, “by the impetuous gentleman
who invented ‘self-determination’? What’s good enough for
Czecho-Slovakia should be good enough for Ireland.”
“How do you propose to apply it?,” he asked.
Literally, I told him: by electing a constituent assembly on universal
suffrage and then by enforcing on all Ireland whatever constitution the
assembly framed.
“But that,” said my father-in-law, who had invited himself to dine with
us, “means coercing Ulster.”
As I felt we could hardly have too many opinions in our symposium, I
urged Frank Jellaby and Carstairs to join us; and every party was
represented by the time that Roger Dainton pulled a chair to the end of
the table.
“I detest coercion,” I said; “but, if it has to be applied, I’d sooner
coerce the few than the many. Because ministers refused to coerce Ulster
in 1913, the rest of Ireland has been coerced ever since. And I never
know why a thing should be called coercion in one country and
‘maintaining law and order’ in every other.”
Having propounded my own policy, I was free to listen while others
propounded theirs. Our speeches, at this date, would make melancholy
reading, for every one said precisely what was expected of him and
precisely what he had said a hundred times before. Writing now at two
years’ remove, I believe and hope that Ireland is on the road to a
settlement; and this dinner two years ago lingers in my recollection as
one more heart-breaking proof that, if the Irish were incapable of
governing themselves, the English were no less incapable of governing
them. Crawleigh, a former viceroy; John Carstairs, a retired diplomat;
my uncle and Dainton, Jellaby and I, with some hundred years of
parliamentary experience between us, all talked with the white-hot
irreconcilability of Capulets and Montagues. It was this temper, I
reminded myself from time to time, that kept me exiled from the County
Kerry: it was this temper that tore me from Barbara’s side. In the years
that followed, when I tried to mark the rock on which my life split, I
always thought of this fatuous debate and of the pale, angry faces round
our echoing table.
It was something, I suppose, that no one prayed for a new Cromwell,
though I attribute this moderation to a doubt whether even Cromwell
could now “reconquer” Ireland and to a fear that those who had drawn the
sword might be the first to perish by the sword. In the last six years
Ireland had made the dire discovery that the north had won an advantage
by threats of violence and that, if the south wished to redress the
balance, it must employ the same means.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account