To-morrow and to-morrow ... a novelMcKenna, Stephen
History
To-morrow and to-morrow ... a novel
McKenna, Stephen
Great Britain -- History -- George V, 1910-1936 -- Fiction; Man-woman relationships -- Fiction; Spouses -- Fiction
“I,” said Dainton, “should be quite content to shoot de Valera as
Casement was shot. Like a dog. Hanging’s too good for him. President of
the Irish Republic, indeed! It’s treason to the king.”
“If you’re going to hang for treason, you must hang for constructive
treason, for constructive mutiny and for acquiescence in constructive
treason and mutiny,” I pointed out: “that brings in the covenanters, the
Curragh people and the Asquith cabinet.” Dainton, I knew, was a
covenanter; and I wanted him to see the implication of his wholesale
executions. “Personally, I don’t think hanging or shooting ever does
much good . . .”
“It would have been a good thing,” Bertrand interrupted, “if you’d shot
the entire 1914 House of Commons.”
“But as a policy for the government in 1920?,” I asked.
I have thought over this dinner a dozen times since; and, when ministers
were attacked for permitting the slaughter and reprisals that followed,
I would sometimes ask their critics if they could do better than the
reasonably intelligent, reasonably well-informed and reasonably sane men
who shewed themselves so crass, ignorant and mad at this meeting.
“For all the good we’ve done,” I told Bertrand, as we walked home, “I
might as well have been in the country.”
“Don’t leave me yet,” he begged.
And throughout the late summer and early autumn I was torn between
Barbara’s entreaties that I should come back to Crawleigh and Bertrand’s
reproach that I was deserting him when he most needed me.
As a study in “that which remained” I suppose these barren passions
claim their place: in our politics, as in our work and play, our
gettings and spendings, our crimes and insanities, we lived more
rapidly, more violently. The growing disorders of Ireland were ascribed
to a “murder-gang”; in the spirit of the age, they were met by irregular
troops, with general instructions to give at least as good as they
received. Under the reign of reprisals, there was inaugurated an
organized terror for which there had been no parallel since the first
French revolution. Burning, looting, killing and torturing were paid
back, with interest, in the same currency. Mysterious and fatal lists of
names were passed up and down the country; the mails were now
intercepted at will; and, when far-scattered, unsuspecting men and women
were done to death by simultaneous blows, a whisper of “spy” and
“counter-spy”—words that had lost their meaning—explained this
opposing secret carnage which no man had power to stop.
Face to face with this slow bleeding to death, I could not shrug my
shoulders and drift away for a holiday with Barbara. The peace of the
world seemed a madman’s dream when we could not stop this butchery at
our doors. Day after day Bertrand and I wrote and talked, interviewed
and argued. On one set of lips or another, every public man was by now
branded as a traitor who had threatened rebellion in Ulster or a traitor
who had broken faith with the South.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account