To-morrow and to-morrow ... a novelMcKenna, Stephen
History
To-morrow and to-morrow ... a novel
McKenna, Stephen
Great Britain -- History -- George V, 1910-1936 -- Fiction; Man-woman relationships -- Fiction; Spouses -- Fiction
“I wanted _you_ to have a holiday from me,” I answered. “No, I missed
you horribly. I should like to think you missed me.”
“Oh, why say that?,” she exclaimed with sudden petulance. “If I could
have a holiday from myself so that I didn’t see how my life has been
wasted, if I could lose my memory . . . Dear God, if I could only die!”
There was no change in her; and I was driven to issue my ultimatum:
“If you’d like me to go away again, I will. And this time I shouldn’t
upset you by coming back. I’ve done my best; and I’ve failed. We can
part friends. If you want a divorce, you can have it now.”. . .
“Somehow, I don’t see you in the divorce-court,” Barbara murmured half
to herself. “I feel you’d bungle it. When I wrote and begged you to come
back, you _would_ . . . by special train.”
“Well, the matter is now in your hands,” I said.
“I think you’ve a finer collection of worn-out phrases than any man I
know,” she cried, again without answering my question.
5
“No change of any kind!,” I told my cousin Violet when we dined with her
a fortnight after my return to England.
Barbara had not mentioned divorce again; and I believe we were summoned
to Loring House with a view to mending the latest breach between Sonia
and her husband. He, unchanging in stubbornness, had published the
article which I rejected and was threatening to follow it with others;
Sonia, unchanging in tactics, had announced that she would walk out of
the house unless he yielded. Bertrand, unchanging in the beloved formula
which he applied indiscriminately to cigarette-smoking, Christianity,
_vers libre_, welfare-work, side-whiskers and “self-determination”,
explained that this was only a phase, which one or other or both would
outgrow. And Violet, whose kindness of heart nothing could change, was
playing counsellor and friend of all parties.
“We, I suppose,” said Barbara, “are to be the object-lesson in domestic
felicity. When women have married the wrong men, as Sonia and I did,
it’s rather a waste of time for any one to patch it up.”
“If there’s been a fair trial,” I said, “you should end what you can’t
mend. Armed neutrality is intolerable.”
From Barbara’s thoughtful look I fancied she was wondering whether I
wanted a divorce in order to marry some one else.
“The trouble is,” she continued, “you never know who is the right man
till you’ve married him. I always thought you had more perfect
understanding than any man I knew . . . Funny!,” she added, as I made no
answer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account