To-morrow and to-morrow ... a novelMcKenna, Stephen
History
To-morrow and to-morrow ... a novel
McKenna, Stephen
Great Britain -- History -- George V, 1910-1936 -- Fiction; Man-woman relationships -- Fiction; Spouses -- Fiction
“You’ve asked me more than once what we’ve done to prevent another war,”
he began. “Here’s your answer: nothing.”
In the last week I had seen but a few provincial papers; I had almost
forgotten the diplomatic moves that led to this check. With all the
suddenness of those August days eight years before, however, I stepped
out of the train at King’s Cross to learn that Great Britain was being
left to fight, single-handed, for the freedom of the Straits, against a
restored and rejuvenated Turkey.
“This is the French reply to the Balfour note,” I said; “their revenge
for our refusing to accompany them into the Ruhr.”
“If you’ll be good enough to tell me what it’s all about . . .” Bertrand
thundered; then he lay back, spent and very old, until I suggested
calling in Fetter Lane to see the latest telegrams.
There was nothing to be learned there; almost nothing to be learned when
I invited myself to dine with the Crawleighs, though I remember this
night with pleasure as the only one on which my father-in-law and I
looked on any political problem with the same eyes. Halfway through
dinner, Neave entered in service-uniform. His battalion had received its
orders for Chanak; he did not know why he was going; we could not tell
him.
“Harington’s a cool-headed fellow,” said Crawleigh to keep his own
courage up. “If he _can_ avoid a conflict . . .”
I remembered the days eight years before when Jim Loring and I kept our
courage up by telling each other that Sir Edward Grey would prevent war
if war could be prevented.
“I _still_ don’t understand,” muttered Lady Crawleigh, as though we were
conspiring to keep some discreditable secret for her.
“No one does, ma,” Neave snapped and then left his father to reach the
same conclusion in less few words.
War was again at our gates; and we had not willed it, we did not want
it. Stalking across Europe from that country which had been most
completely vanquished, it hammered at our gates within four years of the
war that was to have ended war. Whenever in the last three years I had
urged that the incorrigible and blighting Turk should be forced into the
hinterland of Asia Minor, Crawleigh had annotated my articles with the
red-ink comment that we should pay for a peaceful Europe with a hostile
India. Now, though he knew better than most men that Mohammedan India
was not bound to us by ties of love, we awoke to find that, while the
victorious allies were quarrelling at a distance, Turkey had set herself
quietly to recover all that she had lost in the war. When British troops
went unsupported to uphold the Treaty of Sèvres, they were to find their
old enemies equipped with the arms which we had shipped to Russia and
restored to fighting form by officers of the French army.
“But . . . but _why_ . . .?,” Lady Crawleigh kept repeating with
pathetic helplessness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account