We are accustomed to sentimentalising over the courtesan who at last
conceives a "pure" love, but {86} Tolstoy does not write in the spirit
of a Dumas or a Victor Hugo. Máslova is sick of passion; she and
Nekhlúdof redeem each other, but, in the ordinary sense, they do not
love. Máslova throughout the book is one of the most real women in
fiction; we see every detail of her appearance--the white skin, the
black curls over her forehead, the eyes black as sloes and slightly
squinting, the expression of willingness with which she turns to anyone
who addresses her. It is strange how Tolstoy insists on that detail of
the "slightly squinting" eyes; it haunts us as it must have haunted
Nekhlúdof. And her mind and heart are as real as her bodily
personality. Tolstoy, as we have seen, always did possess a marvellous
power of maintaining a consistent personality while permitting his
characters to change and develop, but nowhere else has he shown it in a
manner quite so magical. From the pure romantic young girl to the
prostitute, from the prostitute to the woman redeemed and sweetened and
saved--his heroine is still herself throughout.
It is in the hero that Tolstoy's talent for once fails him, since
Nekhlúdof is too obviously only a mouthpiece for Tolstoy's own
reflections.
We could understand him if the change in him were essentially a
spiritual one similar to that in Máslova, but what Tolstoy has
portrayed is rather a profound intellectual dissatisfaction, so deep
and so far-reaching that it could only have been experienced by a man
of the greatest intellectual and moral power, a man of genius, while
there is nothing in Nekhlúdof's previous life to suggest that he was in
any way out of the ordinary.
He is too slight to undergo the tremendous mental experiences of a
Tolstoy, and we cannot believe that he does; nevertheless, the
experiences remain, and tremendous they are. _Resurrection_ is an
indictment of the whole of society as we know it now, and it is
impossible to read it without the gravest searchings of the heart. It
is true that some of the most serious counts in the indictment apply
mainly to Russia. More than with the West, Russian society is divided
into two great {87} classes--the rich who have everything and are idle,
and the poor, who have nothing and labour; in England we have--in the
professional classes and the better artisans--numbers who possess a
very fair share of the amenities of life and also do valuable work.
Again, it is impossible to say of any large class in our prisons, what
Tolstoy says of the Russian political prisoners: that they get there
because they are the best members of the community, more intelligent,
more unselfish, and more courageous than their fellows.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account