Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 2, April 1905Various
Religion
Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 2, April 1905
Various
United States -- Politics and government -- Periodicals
_John Rutledge_—“Property certainly is the principal object of society.”
_Pierce Butler_—“Slaves should have an equal representation in a
government which is instituted principally for the protection of
property, and is of itself to be supported by property.”
_Charles C. Pinckney_—“Property in slaves should not be exposed to danger
in a government instituted for the protection of property.”
_George Mason_—“It would be as unnatural to refer the choice of a proper
character for President to the people as to refer a test of colors to a
blind man.”
_James Madison_—“In future times a great majority of the people will not
only be without landed but any sort of property. If they combine, the
rights of property will not be safe in their hands.”
_James Ellsworth_—“As population grows, poor laborers will be so plenty
as to render slaves useless.”
The thirteen delegates, from whom I have quoted were the dominating
characters in that convention, and it is possible to cite innumerable
passages expressing the same distrust and contempt for the people.
It should be understood that the great mass of the people had no
representation in that secret conclave, and that half a century passed
before its proceedings were made public by Act of Congress.
I have touched on these facts for the purpose of indicating clearly that
the right to ignore the majority is inherent in the Constitution. The
Senate was provided for the special benefit of property interests, and
at one time a clause was adopted, decreeing that no one could be elected
a Senator of the United States unless he was worth $50,000 or more.
This cautious provision was abandoned because there were states which
had no men with that amount of property. Having provided a Senate they
continued to pile up checks against the people, until such aristocrats as
Gerry, Randolph and Mason attempted to call a halt, declaring that the
people would be so stripped of power that the last of their rights would
disappear. Their warnings were disregarded, and they absolutely refused
to sign their names to the document.
With these facts within access of every citizen of the United States, the
vast majority of us still adhere to the myths and falsehoods contained in
our school books and uttered by ignorant demagogues and editors.
It is likely that the aristocratic delegates who framed the Constitution
had just reason to fear the people it was intended to hold in check. The
average citizen of 1787 was a savage compared with the average voter of
today. He knew of no world beyond the narrow limit of his horizon. He
was ignorant, prejudiced, suspicious and envious. The builders of the
Constitution regretted that it was necessary to grant him even the shadow
of political power and were consumed by the dread that the Lower House of
Congress would overawe all other branches of the new government.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account