Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 3, May 1905Various
History
Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 3, May 1905
Various
United States -- Politics and government -- Periodicals
Sometimes laboring-men become dissatisfied with their wages, or the
number of hours they are made to work, and they exercise their God-given
right to cease work, or go on strike. Then the corporations rush to the
courts and secure injunctions, restraining the strikers from doing all
sorts of things. In some instances these injunctions are obtained and
served on the strikers before any of the acts from which the injunctions
restrain them have been committed or attempted. Special deputy sheriffs
and Pinkerton men are hurried to the scene of the strike. The state
militia is ordered out, and in one instance Federal troops were sent
to Chicago. At Homestead the hired deputy-sheriff-Cossacks shot down
peaceable workmen, just as real Cossacks shot down the peaceable
workmen who marched with Father Gapon in the streets of St. Petersburg
recently—and for no better reason. Martial law has been declared,
court-martial has been substituted for trial by jury. The right of
habeas corpus has been suspended. Members of labor unions have been
thrown into prison without trial; others have been torn from their homes
and deported to other states without process of law, and bull pens
established for guarding prisoners. These things have been happening in
the United States for years. In each instance it was claimed that such
arbitrary measures were necessary to preserve order, keep the peace,
protect the property of the corporations, and to enforce the injunctions
issued by the courts—_when these injunctions were directed against the
laboring or producing class_. Now see how differently things work when a
corporation is at the dangerous end of an injunction gun.
The United States Federal Court, through Judge Grosscup, of Chicago,
issued on February 18, 1903, an injunction restraining the Beef Trust
from continuing to do certain things. The Beef Trust paid _no_ attention
to this injunction. It went right on doing these same things, just as if
Judge Grosscup had not issued his injunction. It went right on despoiling
the bank accounts of the consumers of beef and the raisers of cattle.
No special deputy sheriffs were sworn in, no state militia was ordered
out, no Federal troops were sent to Chicago or anywhere else to enforce
obedience to _this_ injunction. Armour, Swift and Morris, the men said
to be at the head of the Beef Trust, were not arrested. No bull pen was
established. Nobody was deported.
This is the existing custom of enforcing and _not_ enforcing Federal
Court injunctions. Now if you are a conservative, you are, according to
Webster, one who desires to “maintain” this custom.
At the present time the lighting corporation, the railroad corporation,
the telephone corporation and the city or municipal corporation are all
exploiting the people of New York City as they have never been exploited
before.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account