Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 3, May 1905Various
History
Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 3, May 1905
Various
United States -- Politics and government -- Periodicals
“It is the height of folly that this is a panic caused by distrust of
the currency.” On the 29th of the same month the Senator from Colorado,
referring to the Williams House meeting of Secretary Carlisle with
the New York National Bank Presidents, said: “It is a most remarkable
interview; it will go far to support the charges which I am not going to
make on my own authority, but which I am going to make upon the authority
of others, that this panic is a bankers’ panic, brought by the action
of the New York banks, and brought about for distinct purposes, which
purposes were practically avowed on the 27th of April. The same things
have been reiterated by the financial papers, and the policy is still
continued up to the present hour. It had two objects in view. One was to
secure from the United States a large issue of bonds, and the other to
secure the repeal of the much-abused Sherman law.”
The records show that the bankers accomplished both of these objects.
They secured the repeal of the purchasing clause, and afterward the issue
of $262,000,000 in bonds.
In the same speech Senator Teller said: “There are many banks in the
West, and some that I know of, which shut their doors because they could
not draw the money that they had on deposit in New York” (_Congressional
Record_, Vol. XXV, Part I, p. 1022).
In its issue of August 20, 1893, the Chicago _Inter-Ocean_ said:
“When the future historian tells the world of the great financial panic
of 1893, he will say: ‘In the winter and spring months of that year the
New York bankers and financiers sowed the wind, and in the summer months
reaped the whirlwind.’
“We know of no arrangement of words that can more graphically describe
the action of the New York financiers and the results of that action.
Colonel Ingersoll, early in the season of disturbance, properly called
this a ‘bankers’ panic.’ Nor are the New York bankers alone to blame.
Those of Boston and Philadelphia come in for their share.”
But it is useless for me to continue to pile up testimony to further
sustain my contention. Whether the Panic Bulletin is a “canard” or not,
its suggestions were carried into effect. The bankers opposed silver,
and, for the purpose of having the law providing for its issue repealed,
they precipitated the panic and used the methods described in the
Bulletin to accomplish their ends. They are opposed to greenbacks, and
if necessary will, I have no doubt, precipitate another panic in order
to have them retired. And it all goes to show that the control of the
currency should be taken out of their hands.
W. S. MORGAN.
_Hardy, Ark._
_The Cradle of Tears_
BY THEODORE DREISER
_Author of “Sister Carrie”_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account