Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 3, May 1905Various
History
Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 3, May 1905
Various
United States -- Politics and government -- Periodicals
The way to make the cuss-toady-ans of public interests more amenable to
our will is to have ready an Imperative Mandate lariat.
Yes, the trusts are in the people’s pasture, and they got in over
Republican and Democratic fences.
It is better that a whole lot of business shall be “hurted” than that the
trusts should continue to rob the people and be a standing menace to free
government.
The Governor of Kansas is right; building a state refinery is not
Socialism; it is competition, just what the Populists stand for.
The trusts also have “big sticks.”
The Standard Oil Company has outlawed itself and ought to be “swatted”
off the face of the earth.
The bandit bag barons are going to have some hard sledding from now on.
If the concentration of wealth means the destruction of the republic,
then the people have a right to stop the concentration of wealth.
The fact that the trusts are now in control of the railroads is another
reason why the Government should own them.
An economic principle that does not rest upon a moral basis should
receive no support from honest men.
Every applicant for a special legalized privilege is an enemy to good
government.
It is the men who are always hammering at the doors of legislation for
special privileges that want “something for nothing.”
The greatest power in the world is that which controls the volume of
money, and the Republicans are talking about turning that power over to a
few private buccaneers.
When the very rich men are called by their right names there will not be
such a scramble to get rich.
It is to be hoped that in this fight with the trusts and railroad
corporations that “big stick” of Teddy’s will not prove to be a stuffed
club.
If Uncle Sam wants to mix his credit with anybody’s let him mix it with
that of the farmers. Their security is better than bonds.
More that half of the men in the United States Senate wear corporation
collars.
If all the big thieves were sentenced to jail we should have to turn the
little thieves out in order to make room for them.
I challenge anyone to point out a single instance in this country where
the national bankers have made a recommendation in the interests of the
people. It is always a jug-handled proposition in their favor.
One of the biggest pieces of foolishness in this old world of ours is for
Uncle Sam to make free money for the bankers to loan, and then borrow
that same money for his own use.
Unless there is some change made in the manner of selecting United States
senators, that body of corporation attorneys would better be abolished.
So insignificant was the last Presidential candidate of the Democratic
Party that a great many voters have already forgotten his name.
The country is now ready for the election of United States senators by
the people instead of the corporations, but that body of august lawmakers
will block every effort in that direction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account