Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 4, June 1905Various
General
Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 4, June 1905
Various
United States -- Politics and government -- Periodicals
Between 1896 and 1904, as officially reported, the increase in the volume
of visible money was, in millions, $1,322,000,000—or $9.75 per capita;
but the quantity of hocus pocus money in use increased $5,275,000,000—or
$43.42 per capita—the quantity of both kinds then actually in use being
$107.63 per capita. This shows that four-fifths of the increase in the
medium of exchange consists merely of the right given favored people to
draw checks on banks to pay which no real money has been deposited.
In 1888, 5,866 bank reports showed that they were then collecting
interest on $3.41 for each dollar of their capital available for
“commercial loans”; but last year’s reports of the 13,772 national, state
and private banks and loan and trust companies show that their aggregate
capital (including surplus, undivided profits and bank-notes) amounted
to $2,927,000,000. This was everything their owners had put into their
business, and of it $2,743,000,000 had been paid out for bonds, stocks,
real estate, real estate mortgages, etc., leaving only $183,000,000
available for “commercial loans.” And yet their “loans and discounts”
aggregated $6,431,000,000, or $35.07 of “commercial loans” for every
dollar of their not otherwise invested capital. If this is not “_getting
something for nothing_” on a stupendous scale, I should like to know what
would be so considered.
Remember, that these figures include all of the reported banks.
Individual cases are incomparably worse. On December 2, 1899, the
National City Bank, of New York City (the principal of the several
hundred Standard Oil banks), had $6,709,216 of capital, surplus, etc.;
its investments of capital aggregated $27,270,738; its available capital
was therefore $20,561,519 _less than nothing_; and yet it was then
actually earning interest on $60,906,034 of “loans and discounts,” making
$81,467,553 of hocus pocus money. And remember further that, to make
people more dependent on banks for this kind of money with which to do
business, the volume of real money is kept as small as possible. This is
the real reason why bankers engineered the contraction of the currency
after the war and the demonetization of silver. But for them no class of
business men would have consented to either of those economic crimes.
Here are a few more important facts:
1. Interest has to be paid _to the banks_ on every dollar of hocus pocus
money as long as it lives.
2. It lives, on an average, only about two months.
3. Every payment of a note or draft extinguishes the hocus pocus money
involved in that transaction and contracts its volume that much, making
it the most constantly and wildly fluctuating money ever known.
4. Whenever, for any reason, bankers fear a demand for an unusual amount
of real money they make fewer “loans” and “call in” some that are
outstanding, which destroys that part of the “liquid capital” that was in
actual use as a medium of exchange and cramps the money market.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account