Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 4, June 1905Various
General
Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 4, June 1905
Various
United States -- Politics and government -- Periodicals
A Democracy—it being the government of all by all and for the benefit of
all—cannot continue to be a true democracy unless the laws conform to the
democratic standard laid down by Thomas Jefferson—namely, “_Equal and
exact justice to all men, without special favors to any_.”
An Aristocracy is a government in which the few make the laws for their
own benefit, and rule the country for their own good.
Therefore it must be apparent to the most casual student that if we,
by law, confer special favors upon any class of our citizens, we are
building up an aristocracy and are departing from democratic principles.
(1) For instance, the power to create money and to regulate the volume
thereof is a sovereign power belonging to the state.
In countries ruled by kings that power has always been one of the
prerogatives of the crown, as was the power to make war and peace, to
negotiate treaties and to levy taxes. It was recognized that the king
could not continue in the full exercise of his kingly authority if he
parted with the tremendous power of creating money.
Not until the English crown rested upon the head of the most dissolute
of the Stuarts, Charles II, and he had become the slave of an abandoned
woman—who was in turn the tool of a grasping corporation, the East India
Company—was the power to create money transferred from the king to a
corporation.
Ever since that day Great Britain has suffered from this surrender of
sovereign power, and it was this mistake of the king which Alexander
Hamilton, either through mistake or by design, adopted when he came to
frame a financial system for the American people.
It was his express purpose to create an aristocracy of wealth, and he
must have realized that when he took from the government the power to
create money and put it into the hands of a private corporation he was
creating an aristocracy of wealth.
The national banks of today represent an aristocracy of wealth, supported
by the governmental function of creating currency.
There are, in round numbers, 5,000 national bankers who have in
circulation $400,000,000 of their “promises to pay,” which the law
practically makes legal tender.
In other words, their _“promises to pay” are used as money_.
There are 80,000,000 natural persons in this country; there are 5,000
corporations called national banks! The 80,000,000 natural persons may
sign promissory notes for five dollars each, and these notes are simply
commercial paper, having no circulation as money. The 5,000 national
banks sign their promissory notes to the same amount—$400,000,000—and
these notes constitute, for all practical purposes, a national currency—a
national money.
_The law gives them the special privilege of getting rich on what
they owe._ They have also the more dangerous power of _enlarging and
contracting the volume of currency, thus unsettling values, destroying
markets and producing panics, as they did in 1893_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account