Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 4, June 1905Various
General
Tom Watson's Magazine, Vol. I, No. 4, June 1905
Various
United States -- Politics and government -- Periodicals
“Yes.”
“And you love me?”
“And I love you,” I answered. The lanterns were swinging madly now. Over
their light was a new mist growing, growing. I bit my lip—but the throb
of the wound was agony.
“I believe you, dear,” she said simply. “It—it seems hard that—that so
much should rest upon one poor girl. I think I know what—you mean. The
people shall be happy though the Queen’s heart break.” She rose and came
toward me. She caught me by my wounded shoulder and kissed me. And with
all the agony of it that kiss I hold in my heart always as a dear memory.
When she went the lanterns whirled, the mist shut down on my eyes, and I
fell. General Hartzel found me.
The next morning early, recovered of my swoon, I rode out of Tsalburg.
General Hartzel rode with me a little way.
“If you had only been the real King,” he said, with more feeling than I
thought possible, “and not——”
“And not the King’s image,” I filled in. “It is a pity when the clay
image has a living heart.”
_The Story of a Suppressed Populist Newspaper_
BY THOMAS H. TIBBLES
_People’s Party Candidate for Vice-President_
At one time there were fifteen hundred weekly papers advocating the
principles of the Omaha platform. Some of them had large plants, some
only a few cases of type and a Washington press, but all were actuated
by one purpose—to make conditions easier for those who toiled on farms,
in shops, factories, mines and mills. Among those still fighting up to
the first of April of this year was the _Nebraska Independent_. Many
such papers were crushed by various devices, chief among which was that
the great advertisers of the land, all being allied with Wall Street,
refused to give them any business. Numerous instances could be cited
where Populist papers were refused advertisements given to plutocratic
papers not having one-tenth the circulation, and paid for at a higher
rate than the proprietors of the Populist papers would have taken. In
the files of the _Nebraska Independent_ may be found scores of letters
from advertising agents, who had been solicited for business, saying:
“If you will make your paper an exclusively agricultural journal we will
be glad to give you a good line of business, but we cannot patronize it
as long as it advocates Populism.” Every reform editor has had the same
experience.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account