Towards an enduring peace : $b A symposium of peace proposals and programs 1914-1916
History
Towards an enduring peace : $b A symposium of peace proposals and programs 1914-1916
Peace; World War, 1914-1918 -- Peace
America is of course concerned in the present war whether she will or no.
She may, by her material resources in supplies, ammunition, credit, be
largely influencing its decision. As part of the problem of protecting
her own rights, incidentally menaced by the operations of the war, she
has taken very solemnly a certain position in international affairs.
She has declared, for instance, that she stands irrevocably for the
protection of innocent non-combatant life at sea in war time. She would
undoubtedly stand as decisively for certain lesser rights of trade and
free communication on the seas as well (in the past she has gone to war
in their defense) but for the fact that doing so against one belligerent
would aid the cause of the other guilty of still greater offenses.
And if we look beneath diplomatically expressed claims into unofficial,
but unmistakably expressed public opinion, we find America standing
strongly for certain other rules of life between nations—the right of
each nation to national existence for instance—like those violated in the
invasion of Belgium.
Is America really serious in the stand thus made? Or is she going to avow
by her future policy, if not in words, that she will take no real risk
nor assume any real obligation in support of the principles she has been
maintaining diplomatically and by her clearly expressed public opinion.
Is she going to submit lamely, to the indignities and violation of right
involved in the massacre of her innocent non-combatant citizens at sea?
I put the question in that form because it is generally a rhetorical
prelude to the demand for warlike action. And yet the American who is
moved by his country’s dignity and right to have thought this thing out,
as well as to have become angry about it, knows that warlike action is
perhaps the very last thing—though it may be the last thing—which the
situation calls for; and that warlike action alone would be a betrayal
of his country’s highest interests in the matter. If America is really
serious she must prepare herself—in public opinion, in political
education—for action of a different kind: for the abandonment of certain
traditions about freedom from entangling alliances, for the assumption of
risks and obligations which to most Americans is to ask a great deal more
than the mere act of going to war.
Why will war of itself not suffice?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account