Towards an enduring peace : $b A symposium of peace proposals and programs 1914-1916
History
Towards an enduring peace : $b A symposium of peace proposals and programs 1914-1916
Peace; World War, 1914-1918 -- Peace
Even the wholesale transference of peoples of one nationality from one
location to another is a possibility; and, indeed, it is now going on. In
any case the principle itself is clear. Political rule must cease to be
imposed on peoples against their will in the supposed interest of that
great idol, the abstract state. Let the Germans, who belong together,
live together under the same government, pursuing in independence their
national ideal and their national culture. But let them not impose that
ideal and that culture on reluctant Poles and Slavs and Danes. So, too,
let Russia develop her own life over the huge territory where Russians
live. But let her not impose that life on unwilling Poles and Finns. The
English, in history, have been as guilty as other nations of sacrificing
nationality to the supposed exigencies of the State. But of late they
have been learning their lesson. Let them learn it to the end. Let no
community be coerced under British rule that wants to be self-governing.
The British have had the courage, though late, to apply this principle to
South Africa and Ireland. There remains their greatest act of courage and
wisdom—to apply it to India.
[Sidenote: There must be established an international authority.]
A Europe thus rearranged, as it might be at the peace, on a basis of real
nationality instead of on a basis of States, would be a Europe ripe for
a permanent league. And by such a league only, in my judgment, can its
future peace, prosperity, happiness, goodness, and greatness be assured.
There must be an end to the waste upon armaments of resources too scanty,
at the best, to give to all men and women in all countries the material
basis for a good life. But if States are left with the power to arm
against one another they will do so, each asserting, and perhaps with
truth, that it is arming in defense against the imagined aggression of
the others. If all are arming, all will spend progressively more and more
on their armaments, for each will be afraid of being outstripped by the
others. This circle is fatal, as we have seen in the last quarter of a
century.
To secure the peace of Europe the peoples of Europe must hand over their
armaments, and the use of them for any purpose except internal police, to
an international authority. This authority must determine what force is
required for Europe as a whole, acting as a whole in the still possible
case of war against powers not belonging to the league. It must apportion
the quota of armaments between the different nations according to their
wealth, population, resources, and geographical position. And it, and it
alone, must carry on, and carry on in public, negotiations with powers
outside the league. All disputes that may arise between members of the
league must be settled by judicial process. And none of the forces of the
league must be available for purposes of aggression by any member against
any other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account