Towards an enduring peace : $b A symposium of peace proposals and programs 1914-1916
History
Towards an enduring peace : $b A symposium of peace proposals and programs 1914-1916
Peace; World War, 1914-1918 -- Peace
Is it irrelevant in a case like that of the Dardanelles? The Black
Sea region is already a great agricultural exporting region; it is
destined most probably to become the industrial center of Russia. But
to carry out goods, Russian ships must pass through a narrow Turkish
strait. Mr. Dickinson says that for all “peace purposes” the passage is
free. Is it? Let us suppose that Mexico held New York harbor, or that
Ecuador held Liverpool. Would these harbors be free to American and
English commerce? They would be free if Mexico and Ecuador were highly
efficient governments imbued with the doctrine of absolute free trade.
Then commerce might pass through easily. But if Mexicans or Ecuadorians
took it into their heads to exercise sovereignty by setting up a tariff
zone around New York or Liverpool, who would regard political power as
irrelevant to economic power? Certainly not the Manchester exporter as he
paid his customs tax to the pleasant official from Ecuador.
Although England is in no danger from Ecuador, there are nations in the
world which suffer just as fantastically. There is the case of Servia,
shut off from a “window on the sea.” Servia exports pigs, when she isn’t
fighting for the privilege of exporting them. But to export anything she
has to run the gauntlet of an Austrian tariff to the north, Albanian and
Greek discrimination to the west and south. Shut off from the sea, she is
like a man trying to get out of a restaurant who has still to tip the
waiter, the headwaiter, the girl who took care of his hat, and the boy
who brushed it.
[Sidenote: No; political power is an instrument for monopolies and
concessions.]
Political power is not in the least irrelevant to economic power. Mr.
Dickinson has no doubt heard of a thing which we Americans call vulgarly
“dollar diplomacy.” European powers do not call it that, but they
practise it. They call it staking out “spheres of influence,” and there
is nothing sentimental or illusory about it. The nation that can secure
political control of an undeveloped country can decide who shall receive
the mining rights and the railroad franchises, can fix railroad rates
to favor its own manufacturers, can use all the methods which Americans
describe as restraint of trade. It may have been dishonest, it certainly
wasn’t a delusion, when capitalists in those dreadful early days of this
republic bought political power to further economic ends. A legislature
or a governor was generally worth the price in this country, and we
presume that they would be worth the price in Asia Minor. If German
bureaucrats governed Morocco, they would, we suppose, be good to their
friends, almost all of whom have at least a nominal residence east of
Belgium, and French capitalists might then be prospecting fresh mines and
pastures new.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account