In conclusion, rest assured of my continued and unabated attachment
to the cause of the Reformation, in general, and to the interests of
the Reformed Presbyterian Church, in particular; and allow me to
repeat what I have already intimated, that with every other doctrine
contained in our Standards I am, so far as I understand my
profession, entirely satisfied; nor have I abandoned _this one_, but
from a firm conviction that it is not taught in God's Word. I know
well, that trials sore and many await me. God doth know, that my
heart delighteth not in contention; but, my brother, have we not all
"entered into a curse, and into an oath, to walk in God's law, which
was given by Moses, the servant of God, and to observe and do all the
commandments of the Lord our God?" Neh. 10:29.
Your Brother in Gospel bonds,
J. W. MORTON,
Missionary of the Ref. Presb. Church
CHAPTER III.
On the 21st of April, 1819, I set sail, with my family, from
Port-au-Prince, bidding farewell to Haïti and her children, whom
perhaps we shall never see again in this vale of tears. We arrived at
Boston, all in good health, on the first Sabbath in May.
On the evening of Tuesday, May 22, the Synod was convened in
Philadelphia; and the next morning I appeared and took my seat with
the other members.
After noon, the same day, Rev. David Scott stated to Synod, that I had
made known a change of views in relation to the Sabbath, and moved
that a committee of three be appointed to confer with me, and report
what farther action should be taken in the case.
While this motion was pending, I stated, in substance, that, as I was
alone in a Synod of more than sixty members, without a single man to
plead my cause, I thought I had a right to _demand_ that the
proceedings should be instituted in strict accordance with the letter
of the law. I was here interrupted by the Moderator, who, having
informed me that I had no right to dictate to the Court the method of
proceeding with its own business, peremptorily ordered me to take my
seat. I obeyed, of course, though I could not see what dictation there
was in demanding a legal trial, according to the printed rules of
Synod. The motion was carried, and the committee appointed.
Next morning, May 24, I had a conference of half an hour with this
committee, and at noon another, that lasted about the same time. Their
principal object seemed to be, to ascertain whether I was ready to
_recant_, and submit to censure for my past errors, I assured them,
that while I had not the slightest wish to withdraw from the communion
of the Reformed Presbyterian Church, I adhered to every word in my
Circular, and must continue to do so, till convinced of error by the
infallible scriptures. The committee quoted several texts, and advised
me to read several authors, after which our conference was closed.
After noon they presented their report, recommending that the
following Libel be preferred against me by Synod:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account