Mexico -- Commerce; Mexico -- Economic conditions; Mexico -- Politics and government -- 1910-1946
The other contention, more general and yet with a stronger appeal to
modern radicals, was that such nationalization was in line with the
trend of the times, a trend later manifested in the Russian revolution.
Candido Aguilar, then Carranza’s foreign minister, gave voice to this
phase in his note of August 12, 1918, to the British Foreign Office,
where he stated that “the modern conception of property is that it is a
social function bound closely to the prosperity of the State.”
Both these contentions might in fact be worthy of consideration if
the government of Mexico were of a character to be trusted, if it were
indeed genuinely devoted to any sincere ideals of social reform, if it
were truly interested in the conservation of the nation’s resources for
the benefit of the people. But the Mexican governments have been none
of these things, truly believe none of these things. The radicalism
of Mexico, the socialism of Mexico, are means to an end, not ends in
themselves, means to power and position, for loot and for the pelf
which goes into private pockets and not even into national coffers.
Certainly if government could be depended on, the idea of paying
fixed royalties to a national treasury is financially preferable to
dickering with individuals, and obviously more businesslike. But since
oil has been known, the great organizations which handle the product
have been accustomed to dealing with private owners; it is a game they
know, a business they understand. In Mexico there is the other factor
which one can never lose sight of, and that is that government control
means graft, favoritism, chicanery, the meddling of foreigners and big
business in the very heart of the councils of government. And those
things, until now avoided, must never come into being.
In the final analysis, the proposed nationalization of petroleum has
never been a conservation measure, the only excuse (to radical or to
conservative) for its promulgation. The Mexican governments, from
Carranza to Obregon, accepted “denouncements” upon petroleum lands
already developed, granted vast concessions for drilling, on a royalty
arrangement with the government, in so-called navigable streams
and other “federal zones,” and in every way in their power carried
on a _redistribution_ of petroleum titles. This single fact of the
government acceptance of such denouncements and concessions indicates
that the intention is not to conserve, but to get a new deal with
somebody besides the Gringoes and the Indians who own the oil lands
sitting around the table.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account