Mexico -- Commerce; Mexico -- Economic conditions; Mexico -- Politics and government -- 1910-1946
The final phase of the oil problem in particular and of the entire
Mexican question in general is anti-foreignism. Article 27 of the
new constitution contains a number of anti-foreign provisions other
than petroleum nationalization. One is that only Mexican citizens may
develop oil (and other properties) in the republic. Another section of
the Constitution, as I have mentioned, gives this provision force by
requiring that foreigners who sought to work such properties should
appear before a government department and waive all rights of appeal
to their home government for protection. This and other anti-foreign
provisions are summed up in the so-called “Carranza Doctrine,” one of
the interesting developments of his picturesque reign. This has been
stated as follows:
“No individual should aspire to a better situation than that of the
citizens of the country to which he goes; legislation should be
general and abstain from distinctions on account of nationality.
Neither the power of nations nor their diplomacy should serve for
the protection of particular interests or to exert pressure upon the
governments of weak peoples with the end of obtaining modifications of
laws which are disagreeable to the subjects of a powerful country.”
The world outside largely persists in taking Mexican professions at
their face value, and in solemnly accepting the beautiful Mexican laws
and the beautiful Mexican arguments as literally true. On this point
I have quoted elsewhere the words of a great Mexican publicist, who
has written: “The carpet baggers of Mexico have traditions rooted as
far back as colonial times. They combine the shrewd and subtle wit
of the Indian with the grandiose words of modern civilization, with
which they have gained the sympathy of uninformed outsiders.” Our own
State Department has answered the “Carranza Doctrine” in no uncertain
terms and once wrote that “the Department is of the opinion that ...
an attempt is being made to coerce American companies ... to admit in
advance ... the correctness of the contention of the Mexican government
in the matter of ownership of oil deposits, against which the American
government has made solemn protest as threatening confiscation of
rights legally acquired by American citizens.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account