Trains of Recollection: Drawn from Fifty Years of Railway Service in Scotland and Canada, and told to Arthur HawkesHanna, D. B. (David Blyth)
History
Trains of Recollection: Drawn from Fifty Years of Railway Service in Scotland and Canada, and told to Arthur Hawkes
Hanna, D. B. (David Blyth)
Canadian National Railways; Railroads -- Canada; Railroads -- Scotland
The maximum Canadian Northern grade eastward is seven-tenths of one
per cent. The C.P.R. maximum is two per cent.--it was over three
during thirty years of operation. Put another way, by the time you
are twenty miles beyond Calgary on the C.P.R. you are as high as the
highest summit of the C.N.R., and on the C.N.R., instead of having to
rise a further 1,600 feet, and then to climb in a few miles, 1,900
feet more, there is only a negligible second rise to get over the
watershed of the Canoe and the North Thompson rivers, whence the road
to the Pacific is downhill.
The contrast between the Canadian Northern and the more southerly
American roads is even greater. The Union Pacific switchbacks to a
maximum of 8,200 feet, and the Sante Fé to 7,421 feet.
The difference made by the grades to operating costs can be judged
by the difference in the load which an engine can pull up a
four-tenths and a one per cent. grade. Up twenty-six feet to the
mile--four-tenths--a 190-ton locomotive will haul 3,768 tons. Up
sixty-feet per mile--one per cent.--she will drag only 1,780 tons.
The disparity increases with the acclivity.
The Canadian Northern, then, had the elements of a great permanent
success, given enough tributary population creating traffic to earn
expenses and fixed charges during the earlier operating years. That
there was calamitous overbuilding of Canadian railways nobody will
deny. To attempt to fix responsibility for it might invite a certain
degree of political controversy which no lover of a quiet life
desires. This is a strictly moral tale, and a few facts will point
out their own moral.
In 1904, when a general election solidified the Grand Trunk Pacific
legislation, the Canadian Northern had already in existence 2,500
miles beyond Port Arthur, all aiding the Western development which
was absolutely vital to Canada’s future. This railway was altogether
a native growth, the executive force in which had been concerned
with Western railway construction since before the first locomotive
entered Winnipeg. There was no imposition from without--no grandiose
scheme intended to dazzle an electorate, or fill a Parliament with
swelling pride. The Canadian Northern grew in Time’s own fruitful
womb; and struck its roots deep and wide all over the Western land.
From the point of view of the prairie provinces’ development, the
nicer problem of the wisdom of hastening the Superior and Mountain
sections may be put aside momentarily by this question: “What would
be the relative positions of the two junior railways if their
revenues depended solely on traffic originating between the Great
Lakes and the Great Mountains?”
In different terms, the question is: “How do the old Canadian
Northern and the old Grand Trunk Pacific compare, twenty years after
the Grand Trunk Pacific was launched, as servants of the country,
which is the only reason for their existence?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account