Trains of Recollection: Drawn from Fifty Years of Railway Service in Scotland and Canada, and told to Arthur HawkesHanna, D. B. (David Blyth)
History
Trains of Recollection: Drawn from Fifty Years of Railway Service in Scotland and Canada, and told to Arthur Hawkes
Hanna, D. B. (David Blyth)
Canadian National Railways; Railroads -- Canada; Railroads -- Scotland
The war changed all that. With London closed to him, the indomitable
Sir William, who never parted with his nerve, found in New York
a combination which was willing to consider seeing the Canadian
Northern through, by taking care of the millions of dormant
securities that must become active, by paying off the short-term
notes; and by furnishing the funds necessary to raise the system to a
standard worthy of its Dominion-wide theatre of operation.
While we hung on to the job of making the best of a heart-breaking,
never-ending crisis, which even the delusive gains of the war could
not mitigate, the New York syndicate invited Mr. E. E. Loomis, now
President of the Lehigh Valley Railroad, and Mr. J. W. Platten,
President of the United States Mortgage and Trust Company, of New
York, to report on the value of the property. These gentlemen, in
turn, appointed Messrs. Coverdale and Colpitts, two Canadians of high
standing in the engineering profession in the United States, who had
been conspicuously engaged in railway and industrial valuations, to
examine thoroughly the physical features and contributories of nearly
ten thousand miles of Canadian Northern railway.
A year was spent on this investigation. But, while it was going on,
the Dominion Government, in view of the perilous condition of the
old Grand Trunk, as menaced by its offspring, the G.T.P., and of the
utterly hopeless position of the National Transcontinental, which the
Grand Trunk had refused to take over, appointed a Royal Commission,
consisting of Sir Henry Drayton, chairman of the Dominion Board of
Railway Commissioners, President Smith of the New York Central lines,
and Mr. William Acworth, an eminent British railway economist, to
report on the whole railway situation of Canada. No criticism is due
the Government for this action, in view of its commitments to both
junior transcontinentals.
Early in 1917 the Coverdale-Colpitts report was printed. It
absolutely justified the broad policy on which the Canadian Northern
had been built; and there was good reason to expect that the New York
syndicate would participate in Canadian Northern responsibilities.
But on its heels came the Drayton-Acworth report, recommending
nationalization, and the Smith minority report, demurring. No
syndicate in the world would have committed itself to heavy financing
of a great railway system, under such conditions. The New York people
held off. We held on, but with only the scantest chance of coming
through the war corporately alive.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account