Trains of Recollection: Drawn from Fifty Years of Railway Service in Scotland and Canada, and told to Arthur HawkesHanna, D. B. (David Blyth)
History
Trains of Recollection: Drawn from Fifty Years of Railway Service in Scotland and Canada, and told to Arthur Hawkes
Hanna, D. B. (David Blyth)
Canadian National Railways; Railroads -- Canada; Railroads -- Scotland
Our first year, (and the first post-war year,) 1919, far from seeing
any let up to the accumulation of embarrassing labor conditions
originating in the McAdoo award and its many supplements, or a
reduction in costs of material, brought an aggravation of the
situation. The United States Government’s decision to accept
the losses of the United States railroad administration as war
expenditures, was official recognition of the disproportion between
expenses and gross earnings. We carried on without charging any of
our difficulties to war account.
Freight and passenger rates in 1919 remained stationary, while
wholesale prices, according to the Department of Labour’s index,
advanced from 286.5 to 322.7, and the average annual wage of railway
employes increased from $1,061.20 to $1,315.93.
In this year, due to the large amount of deferred maintenance which
was essential to bringing the property up to normal conditions, the
increase in labour cost alone was $19,000,000, and in materials
$2,500,000. The increased cost of our labour was more than half of
the total annual revenue of the Dominion Government when Sir George
Foster became Minister of Finance.
“From bad to worse” describes the situation in 1920, from the
operating point of view. The Canadian National, in common with
other Canadian railways, was carrying the accumulated burdens of
the McAdoo award and its oppressive supplements, etc., as well as
still higher costs for coal, materials and supplies. The inadequacy
of earnings in this situation was fully recognized; but the rates
question was not dealt with in Canada. The continuation of the United
States Government guarantee of pre-war profits to the railroads up
to September, 1920--twenty-two months after the armistice--prevented
increases of charges over there to meet the increased wages. As we
were operating under United States wage rates it was felt that the
Railway Commission should hold us down to United States freight rate
levels.
In this year, too, another crushing blow was dealt the railways by
the Chicago award, which was adopted in Canada under strike pressure.
The award which was made in September, but was retroactive to May
8th, increased wages by over 25 per cent. This, applying to more than
four months’ back pay involved a payment by the Canadian National of
almost six million dollars.
During this year of boom prices and deferred maintenance, the
programme of improvements and betterments had to continue, as much
of the work could not longer be deferred. But at what a cost! In
labour and materials, exclusive of coal, the increase approximated
$29,000,000. In our direct transportation account, our coal bill
alone showed an increase of $6,200,000.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account