Traitor and True: A RomanceBloundelle-Burton, John
History
Traitor and True: A Romance
Bloundelle-Burton, John
France -- History -- Louis XIV, 1643-1715 -- Fiction
The confrontations of the prisoners with one another and the
administration of questions, based upon the answers they had made to
their earlier interrogations, were over at last. There remained now
but one thing farther to be done, one further suffering to be endured
by the unhappy conspirators ere their doom, which was certain, was
pronounced; namely, to endeavour to extract their confessions from
them by torture. This system, still in general use in France and
still to remain so for another century, was regarded as the one and
only final opportunity of extracting from criminals--real or
suspected--some confession which should justify their judges in
sentencing them to death. For, if from those criminals who were
innocent there could be wrung the slightest word that even sounded
like an acknowledgment of guilt, the judges could condemn them with a
sound conscience; while, even if the really criminal had already
confessed their guilt, the application of torture was still generally
applied in the hopes that, thereby, some actual or imaginary
accomplices might be implicated.
La Reynie, determined to extort confessions from the four prisoners
who had appeared before their judges at the Arsenal, had already
decided by midnight that all should be submitted to the "question."
This resolve, however, was negatived by the majority of those judges.
De Beaurepaire was, they said, too high in position to be treated with
such indignity; he had been too closely allied with the King, both as
friend and exalted subject as well as bearer of great offices, to be
submitted to such degradation; and they had made up their minds that
he was guilty and must die. Therefore he was exempted from torture.
To their honour, the same exemption was granted to Emérance on the
plea that she was a woman and was also to die.
"It is a noble resolution," exclaimed the Père Bourdaloue, who had
been deputed to discover by exhortation the truth and extent of their
guilt, if possible. "A noble one. She is a woman. If, like another,
she has sinned, so, also, she has loved and suffered."
From the two others, however, Fleur de Mai and Van den Enden, nothing
could be obtained in any shape or form at the trial except denials of
every statement made. Therefore both, instead of Van den Enden alone,
were now to be submitted to the torture.
Yet, once again, as Van den Enden was led into the room where he was
to submit to the trial of the Wedge or _Coin_ as it was termed,
Bourdaloue made a final attempt not only to extract some admission
from him but also, from Christian charity, to spare so old a man
unnecessary pain.
"My son," he said, "reflect. Why force your judges to obtain by
torture that which may be told freely, since you are surely doomed.
Remember, there is another world to which you are hastening; a God
whom you have outraged----"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account