Travels and discoveries in North and Central Africa, Vol. 1 (of 5) : $b being a journal of an expedition undertaken under the auspices of H.B.M.'s Government, in the years 1849-1855Barth, Heinrich
History
Travels and discoveries in North and Central Africa, Vol. 1 (of 5) : $b being a journal of an expedition undertaken under the auspices of H.B.M.'s Government, in the years 1849-1855
Barth, Heinrich
Africa, Central -- Description and travel; Africa, North -- Description and travel
Over these pillars, which at present lean to one side, is laid another
enormous stone about 6 feet 6½ inches long, and of the same width as the
pillars, so that the whole structure bears a surprising resemblance to
the most conspicuous part of the celebrated Celtic ruins at
Stonehenge[19] and other ruins in Malabar[20], about the religious
purpose of which not the least doubt remains at present. But besides
these, there are other very curious stones of different workmanship, and
destined evidently for different purposes; some of them are large, flat,
and quadrangular, very peculiarly worked, and adapted, probably, to
sacrifices. One of them is three feet in length and breadth, but with a
projection on one side, as is represented in the woodcut, and 1 ft. 2′
high. On the surface of this stone, and parallel to its sides, is carved
a channel 4⁸⁄₁₀ inches broad, forming a quadrangle; and from this a
small channel branches along the projecting part. Several stones of
similar workmanship lie about. There is also the remnant of an enormous
stone 3 feet 7½ inches at the back and across, but rounded off at the
corners, looking like a solid throne, excepting that on the upper side
there is an excavation measuring 1 ft. 3²⁄₁₀ in. at the back, 9⁶⁄₁₀
inches on the front, and 1 ft. 1²⁄₁₀ in. across, and about 10 inches
deep, with a small opening. This stone looks very peculiar, and probably
formed an altar.
These ruins are certainly very remarkable. Any one who looks at them
without prejudice or preconceived opinion, will be impressed with the
belief that they belonged to a place of worship; though how this
peculiar structure could be adapted to religious purposes, I will not
undertake to decide. It is well known, that the most ancient idols were
mere pillars or stones, not only of a round or conical shape, as symbols
of the procreative power of nature, but even of a square form. It is
also well known, from the example of the columns in On or Heliopolis, of
the two celebrated columns, Yakín and Boʿaz, in front of the temple in
Jerusalem, and from that of the two pillars of the Phœnician Hercules in
Gades, that the power of the Deity was often represented by a pair. A
pair of massive columns or pillars, covered with a similarly massive
impost, may well serve to represent symbolically the firmness and
eternity of the cosmical order, while the name of the chief deity of the
pagan Berbers, ʿAmún, may possibly have the original meaning of “the
Founder, Supporter.” But I will not enter here into such conjectures; I
will only say that my distinct impression on the spot was, that the
structure was a rude kind of sun-dial, combining the vertical with the
horizontal principle. That it could not be intended as a common doorway,
even if it were connected with another building, is evident from the
narrowness of the passage; but it may have had the purpose of serving as
a sort of penitential or purgatory passage in consecrating and preparing
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account