Travels and discoveries in North and Central Africa, Vol. 4 (of 5) : $b being a journal of an expedition undertaken under the auspices of H.B.M.'s Government, in the years 1849-1855Barth, Heinrich
History
Travels and discoveries in North and Central Africa, Vol. 4 (of 5) : $b being a journal of an expedition undertaken under the auspices of H.B.M.'s Government, in the years 1849-1855
Barth, Heinrich
Africa, Central -- Description and travel; Africa, North -- Description and travel
South of the river two other provinces are mentioned by Áhmed Bábá,
namely, the province of Hómbori, which from the nature of the country
was also called Tondi, or El Hajri, and Burgu[106], or rather Barba,
though the latter country was apparently never entirely subjected.
The governors of these provinces were certainly possessed of
considerable power, and belonging, as they did in general, to the royal
family, exercised a very prejudicial influence upon the destinies of the
empire, as at the same time the central government became weak and
debilitated. The governor of Kúrmina, especially, conscious of the
important influence and the rich character of his province, was very
prone to mutiny and revolt. For as it was certainly a great advance in
the scale of civilisation, that it was not customary amongst the Songhay
to murder the younger brothers of the newly elected king, or to render
them incapable of aspiring to the royal dignity by depriving them of
their sight (as is still the custom in Wádáy), or in some other manner
disabling them; so, on the other hand, it was no doubt very prejudicial
to the stability of the empire, that so many royal princes were
constantly installed as governors of powerful provinces, some of them
situated at a great distance from the capital. Such a government could
only prosper under the rule of a powerful king, such as Mohammed el Háj
Áskía was during his most vigorous period.
On the other hand, we find that the government of Songhay was far more
despotic than that of Bórnu, where, as I have had occasion to
relate[107], the election of a new king from among the royal princes was
placed in the hands of three electors, themselves chosen from the most
trustworthy men of the country; while the kings of Songhay appear
originally to have designated their own successor among the royal
princes, there being even an established dignity of something like an
heir-apparent or crown-prince, with the title of “feréng-mangha:”[108]
but this principle, as is naturally the case in barbaric states without
any written constitution, was only observed as long as the king
exercised paramount authority, while we see in other cases the army, or
even a powerful governor, choosing a successor, as that of Dendi, who
deposed Mohammed Bánkorí, and installed in his place Áskía Ismʿaíl.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account