Travels in Africa, Egypt, and Syria, from the year 1792 to 1798Browne, William George
History
Travels in Africa, Egypt, and Syria, from the year 1792 to 1798
Browne, William George
Egypt -- Description and travel; Sudan -- Description and travel; Syria -- Description and travel
The statues of the Nile, it is said, were made of black marble,
in allusion to his coming from Ethiopia. If this symbol, hitherto
so unsatisfactorily explained, (the Sphinx,) had any relation to
the same subject, might not the negro face be given to it for a
similar reason[28]? It would hardly have been thought necessary to
explain why the figure of the Nile was black, if the complexion of
the natives of Egypt had been generally acknowleged of the same tinge.
The complete silence of the antient writers, concerning so singular a
circumstance as that of the negro character of the Egyptians, if all
other arguments were equally balanced, would be sufficient to decide
this point in the negative. In defect, however, of historical and
positive testimony, strong circumstantial evidence is drawn from the
monuments of undoubted antiquity yet remaining. Among these are the
small statues of Isis, &c. daily found among the ruins in various
parts of Egypt. These are adorned with a profusion of long hair,
peculiarly contorted, and the nose, lips, and other features, are far
from resembling those of the negro. The same may be observed of the
figures in alto relievo and basso relievo, on the walls at Thebes,
in the caverns of Gebel-el-Silsili, &c. Of the Colossal statues at
Thebes, the features are too much damaged to be adduced in proof.
The two harpers, and several other human figures in the caverns
of Thebes, called _Biban-el-molûk_, (tombs of the kings,) and in
which the colours are perfectly well preserved, have the features
and complexion exactly resembling the Egyptians of the present day.
The apparent testimony of Herodotus, the earliest historian whose works
have reached our days, is not so strong as might at first appear. The
terms μελάγχροες και ουλότριχες are merely relative, and apply to the
greater or less degree of blackness and crispature of the Egyptians, as
compared with the Greeks, to whom the writer was addressing himself; and
certainly cannot be confined to positive blackness or woolly hair. To
corroborate this interpretation of the passage from Herodotus, may be
adduced a similar one from Ammianus Marcellinus, lib. xxii. That author
says, that the Egyptians are _Atrati_, a term of equally strong import
with the μελάγχροες of Herodotus, but, like it, evidently applied in a
comparative sense; for, in the very next sentence, he says,
_erubescunt_, they blush, or grow red. It is true, indeed, negroes
suffer a certain change of countenance when affected with the sentiment
of shame, but it would be rather a bold assertion that the word
_erubescere_ can ever be applied to characterise the effect of that
feeling on a negro. Even in the vernacular idioms of modern Europe, by
the term a _black man_, is daily designated one of visibly a darker
complexion than ourselves. Besides, what antient writer has described
the inhabitants of Colchis? Was Medea, the Love of the Grecian heroes,
a negress?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account