Travels into Turkey: Containing the most accurate account of the Turks, and neighbouring nations, their manners, customs, religion, superstition, policy, riches, coins, &c.Busbecq, Ogier Ghislain de
History
Travels into Turkey: Containing the most accurate account of the Turks, and neighbouring nations, their manners, customs, religion, superstition, policy, riches, coins, &c.
Busbecq, Ogier Ghislain de
Turkey -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800
A great many favoured _Bajazet_, because he was like his Father; whereas
_Selimus_ had not one Feature in his Face resembling him. ’Tis true, he
was very like his Mother, a Woman hated while she was alive. He was a
big-bellied Man, with swoln Cheeks, and his Face of a deep and uncomely
Redness; insomuch, that the Soldiers would seemingly say, _He was cramm’d
with Barley-Pudding_. Besides, he liv’d a slothful, banquetting, idle
Life; neither was he courteous, or of easy Access, nor did he oblige
by any act of Generosity. The Reason he gave, was, that he would not
offend his Father, by aiming at popular Applause. Thus he became dear
to his Father only, but odious to every body else; yea, those Persons
did most disdain him, who coveted a munificent and an active Emperor.
The same Soldiers that were wont to call _Bajazet_, _Softi_ (a sedentary
Man, and given up to his Studies) when they saw that he took up Arms,
and ventured his All to defend himself and his Children, now extolled
him to the Skies, as a Man of extraordinary Valour. Why (said they,
reasoning among themselves) should his Father abdicate a Son that is his
express Image? Why should he prefer his slothful, pot-bellied Brother,
that has nothing of his Father’s Disposition in him? As for _Bajazet_’s
taking Arms, Necessity forces him to it, and therefore, he is not to be
blamed; for did not _Selimus_, his Grandfather, do the same? What great
Precedent could there be? For he did not only arm against his Brother,
but Necessity also compelled him to hasten his Father’s Death; and yet by
this Procedure he established the Kingdom to himself and his Posterity.
Now, if _Solyman_ did rightfully possess that Kingdom, so gotten, why
should his Son be denied to take the same Course? Why should that Fact be
thought so heinous in him, which was accounted lawful in his Grandfather?
And yet the Case is much different (said they); for _Bajazet_ did not
take up Arms against his Father, but wishes him a long Life; nay, he
would not hurt an Hair of his Brother’s Head, if he could be sure of his
own Life, against him: But ’tis always lawful to resist Force by Force,
and, if possible, to prevent one’s own certain Ruin. These Discourses
caused many to fly to _Bajazet_, and his Army being now of a moderate
Size, without delay, he marches towards his Brother, putting his Life,
Fortune, and the hope of his Empire, upon the Event of the Battel; for
thus, thought he, my Valour (at least) will be commended, if it be not
prosperous; I will endeavour if I can, to break my way into _Syria_, and,
if I succeed therein, my Business is done.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account