Travels through Central Africa to Timbuctoo; and across the Great Desert, to Morocco, performed in the years 1824-1828, Vol. 1 (of 2)Caillié, René
History
Travels through Central Africa to Timbuctoo; and across the Great Desert, to Morocco, performed in the years 1824-1828, Vol. 1 (of 2)
Caillié, René
Sahara -- Description and travel; Sudan (Region) -- Description and travel
On our return to the hut, he begged me, in the presence of the
Mandingo, to examine my baggage once more. After various useless
searches, long discussions, and many goings and comings, the razor
was at length found in the millet jar, where I am certain it had been
that moment put, in the hope of persuading me that it had not been
stolen but mislaid. Lamfia wished to restore it to me, but I would
not take it, telling him that I wished to have at the same time,
all the things I had lost. At this observation he appeared very much
disconcerted. Two old men advised me to complain to the chief, if the
thief did not immediately restore every thing he had taken. I seized
the idea, and threatened to adopt it. He was alarmed, and requested
me to wait a little. After a moment’s reflexion he observed, that
as I had been robbed under his roof, and as my person and property
had been entrusted to his care by the chief of Cambaya, I was under
his responsibility, and he therefore considered himself bound to make
good whatever I had lost. On this condition I promised silence; but,
finding that he was in no hurry to keep his word, and fearing to be
plundered a third time, I followed the advice of several old men,
who accompanied me to the chief of the district, to beg of him to
give me a lodging, until an opportunity should occur for travelling
across the forest of Wassoulo. Lamfia, who accompanied us, carried
my sack. He had already several times proposed to go to the mansa,
to submit to an ordeal, which consisted in passing a red-hot iron
across the tongue. The person accused is acquitted if the iron do not
burn him, but in that case the accuser is obliged to submit to the
same ordeal. Judgment is pronounced against the party who refuses
to undergo the operation. If it be the prosecutor, he must make
reparation by giving the accused a present; if the latter, he must
restore the value of what he is thus found guilty of stealing. This
absurd custom, which ignorance has established, prevails throughout
the whole of western Africa.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account