Travels through the states of North America, and the provinces of Upper and Lower Canada, during the years 1795, 1796, and 1797 [Vol. 2 of 2]Weld, Isaac
History
Travels through the states of North America, and the provinces of Upper and Lower Canada, during the years 1795, 1796, and 1797 [Vol. 2 of 2]
Weld, Isaac
Canada -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800; United States -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800
Niagara River runs nearly in a due south direction, and falls into Lake
Ontario on the southern shore, about thirty miles to the east-ward of
the western extremity of the lake. It is about three hundred yards wide
at its mouth, and is by far the largest body of water flowing into Lake
Ontario. On the eastern side of the river is situated the fort, now in
the possession of the people of the States, and on the opposite or
British side the town, most generally known by the name of Niagara,
notwithstanding that it has been named Newark by the legislature. The
original name of the town was Niagara, it was afterwards called Lenox,
then Nassau, and afterwards Newark. It is to be lamented that the Indian
names, so grand and sonorous, should ever have been changed for others.
Newark, Kingston, York, are poor substitutes for the original names of
these respective places, Niagara, Cataragui, Toronto. The town of
Niagara hitherto has been, and is still the capital of the province of
Upper Canada; orders, however, had been issued, before our arrival
there, for the removal of the seat of government from thence to Toronto,
which was deemed a more eligible spot for the meeting of the legislative
bodies, as being farther removed from the frontiers of the United
States. This projected change is by no means relished by the people at
large, as Niagara is a much more convenient place of resort to most of
them than Toronto; and as the governor who proposed the measure has been
removed, it is imagined that it will not be put in execution. The
removal of the seat of government from Niagara to Toronto, according to
the plan laid down, was only to have been a preparatory step to another
alteration: a new city, to have been named London, was to have been
built on the river formerly called La Trenche, but since called the
Thames, a river running into Lake St. Clair; and here the seat of
government was ultimately to have been fixed. The spot marked out for
the site of the city possesses many local advantages. It is situated in
a healthy fertile country, on a fine navigable river, in a central part
of the province, from whence the water communication is extensive in
every direction. A few settlements have already been made on the banks
of the river, and the tide of emigration is setting in strongly towards
that quarter; at a future day, therefore, it is by no means improbable
but that this spot may be deemed an eligible one for the capital of the
country; but to remove the seat of government immediately to a place
little better than a wilderness, and so far from the populous parts of
the province, would be a measure fraught with numberless inconveniencies
to the public, and productive apparently of no essential advantages
whatsoever.
[Sidenote: NIAGARA TOWN.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account