Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 1 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773Bruce, James
History
Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 1 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773
Bruce, James
Egypt -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- History; Natural history -- Ethiopia; Nile River
On the day of the summer solstice, at the moment the sun was stationary
in the meridian of Syene, he placed a style perpendicularly in the
bottom of a half-concave sphere, which he exposed in open air to the
sun at Alexandria. Now, if that style had cast no shade at Alexandria,
it would have been precisely in the same circumstance with a style in
the well in Syene; and the reason of its not casting the shade would
have been, that the sun was directly vertical to it. But he found,
on the contrary, this style at Alexandria did cast a shadow; and by
measuring the distance of the top of this shadow from the foot of the
style, he found, that, when the sun cast no shadow at Syene, by being
in the zenith, at Alexandria he projected a shadow; which shewed he
was distant from the vertical point, or zenith, 7⅕°=7° 12´, which was
1/50th of the circumference of the whole heavens, or of a great circle.
This being settled, the conclusion was, that Alexandria and Syene must
be distant from each other by the 50th part of the circumference of the
whole earth.
Now 5000 stades was the distance already assumed between Alexandria
and the well of Syene; and all that was to be done was to repeat 5000
stades fifty times, or multiply 5000 stades by 50, and the answer was
250,000 stades, which was the total of the earth’s circumference. This,
admitting the French contents of the Egyptian stadium to be just, will
amount to 11,403 leagues for the circumference of the earth sought;
and as our present account fixes it to be 9000, the error will be 2403
leagues in excess, or more than one-fourth of the whole sum required.
This observation surely therefore is not worth recording, unless to
shew the insufficiency or imperfection of the method; it cannot deserve
the encomiums[146] that have been bestowed upon it, if justice has
been done to Eratosthenes’ geodesique measures, which I do not, by any
manner of means, warrant to be the case, because the measure of his
arch of the meridian seems to have been conducted with a much greater
degree of success and precision than that of his base.
On the 22d, 23d, and 24th of January, being at Syene, in a house
immediately east of the small island in the Nile (where the temple of
Cnuphis is still standing, very little injured, and which [147]Strabo,
who was himself there, says was in the ancient town, and near the well
built for the observation of the solstice) with a three-foot brass
quadrant, made by Langlois, and described by [148]Monsieur de la Lande,
by a mean of three observations of the sun in the meridian, I concluded
the latitude of Syene to be 24° 0´ 45´´ north.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account