Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 1 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773Bruce, James
History
Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 1 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773
Bruce, James
Egypt -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- History; Natural history -- Ethiopia; Nile River
In order to come to a certainty where this Ophir was, it will be
necessary to examine what scripture says of it, and to keep precisely
to every thing like description which we can find there, without
indulging our fancy farther. _First_, then, the trade to Ophir was
carried on from the Elanitic Gulf through the Indian Ocean. _Secondly_,
The returns were gold, silver, and ivory, but especially silver[276].
_Thirdly_, The time of the going and coming of the fleet was precisely
three years[277], at no period more nor less.
Now, if Solomon’s fleet sailed from the Elanitic Gulf to the Indian
Ocean, this voyage of necessity must have been made by monsoons, for no
other winds reign in that ocean. And, what certainly shews this was the
case, is the precise term of three years, in which the fleet went and
came between Ophir and Ezion-gaber. For it is plain, so as to supersede
the necessity of proof or argument, that, had this voyage been made
with variable winds, no limited term of years ever could have been
observed in its going and returning. The fleet might have returned from
Ophir in two years, in three, four, or five years; but, with variable
winds, the return precisely in three years was not possible, whatever
part of the globe Ophir might be situated in.
Neither Spain nor Peru could be Ophir; part of these voyages must have
been made by variable winds, and the return consequently uncertain. The
island of Ceylon, in the East Indies, could not be Ophir; the voyage
thither is indeed made by monsoons, but we have shewed that a year is
all that can be spent in a voyage to the East Indies; besides, Ceylon
has neither gold nor silver, though it has ivory. St. Domingo has
neither gold, nor silver, nor ivory. When the Tyrians discovered Spain,
they found a profusion of silver in huge masses, but this they brought
to Tyre by the Mediterranean, and then sent it to the Red Sea over land
to answer the returns from India. Tarshish, too, is not found to be a
port in any of these voyages, so that part of the description fails,
nor were there ever elephants bred in Spain.
These mines of Ophir were probably what furnished the East with gold
in the earliest times; great traces of excavation must, therefore,
have appeared; yet in none of the places just mentioned are there
great remains of any mines that have been wrought. The ancient traces
of silver-mines in Spain are not to be found, and there never were
any of gold. John Dos Santos[278], a Dominican friar, says, that on
the coast of Africa, in the kingdom of Sofala, the main-land opposite
to Madagascar, there are mines of gold and silver, than which none
can be more abundant, especially in silver. They bear the traces of
having been wrought from the earliest ages. They were actually open and
working when the Portuguese conquered that part of the peninsula, and
were probably given up since the discovery of the new world, rather
from political than any other reasons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account