Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 1 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773Bruce, James
History
Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 1 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773
Bruce, James
Egypt -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- History; Natural history -- Ethiopia; Nile River
The Etesian wind, fair as it could blow, forwarded their course whilst
in this line. They went directly before the wind, and, if we may
suppose, accomplished the navigation in a very few hours; having been
provided with those barks, or canjas, with their powerful sails, which
I have already described, and, by means of which, they shortened their
passage greatly, as well as added pleasure to it.
But very different was the case if the canja was going to Geeza.
They had nothing to do with the Pyramids, nor to come within three
leagues of the Pyramids; and nothing can be more contrary, both to fact
and experience, than that they would shorten their voyage by sailing
along the side of them; for the wind being at north and north-west as
fair as possible for Geeza, they had nothing to do but to keep as
direct upon it as they could lie. But if, as Dr Shaw thinks, they made
the Pyramids first, I would wish to know in what manner they conducted
their navigation to come down upon Geeza.
Their vessels go only before the wind, and they had a strong steady
gale almost directly in their teeth.
They had no current to help them; for they were in still water; and
if they did not take down their large yards and sails, they were so
top-heavy, the wind had so much purchase upon them above, that there
was no alternative, but, either with sails or without, they must make
for Upper Egypt; and there, entering into the first practicable calish
that was full, get into the main stream.
But their dangers were not still over, for, going down with a violent
current, and with their standing rigging up, the moment they touched
the banks, their masts and yards would go overboard, and, perhaps, the
vessel stave to pieces.
Nothing would then remain, but for safety’s sake to strike their masts
and yards, as they always do when they go down the river; they must
lie broadside foremost, the strong wind blowing perpendicular on one
side of the vessel, and the violent current pushing it in a contrary
direction on the other; while a man, with a long oar, balances the
advantage the wind has of the stream, by the hold it has of the cabin
and upper works.
This would most infallibly be the case of the voyage from Naucratis,
unless in striving to sail by tacking, (a manœuvre of which their
vessel is not capable) their canja should overset, and then they must
all perish.
If Memphis was Metrahenny, I believe most people who had leisure would
have tried the voyage from Naucratis by the plain. They would have
been carried straight from north to south. But Dr Shaw is exceedingly
mistaken, if he thinks there is any way so expeditious as going up the
current of the river. As far as I can guess, from ten to four o’clock,
we seldom went less than eight miles in the hour, against a current
that surely ran more than six. This current kept our vessel stiff,
whilst the monstrous sail forced us through with a facility not to be
imagined.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account