Travels to Tana and Persia : $b A narrative of Italian travels in Persia, in the 15th and 16th centuriesBarbaro, Giosofat
History
Travels to Tana and Persia : $b A narrative of Italian travels in Persia, in the 15th and 16th centuries
Barbaro, Giosofat
Iran -- Description and travel; Voyages and travels
In the year of our Lord Jesus Christ one thousand four hundred and
fifty, (1450), Giausa,[176] being King of Persia, _Assimbeo_[177]
(who, from that time, on account of his deeds, called himself _Ussun
Cassano_,[178] which in the Persian tongue signifies “great man”), not
contenting himself with being Lord of a small castle, began by little
and little to usurp the states, and the jurisdictions of his other
brothers less powerful than himself,[179] who, either not being of a
warlike disposition or for some other reason, preferred living in ease
and not opposing his ambition. Thus he without difficulty raised himself
in credit and reputation. Ussun Cassano was a warlike, valiant man,
and above all of great liberality, which is a rare virtue, to enable
great lords to gain over the affections of the soldiery, provided it
is exercised at the proper time and place, and towards the deserving
(so that he who makes use of it be not esteemed of small judgment or a
prodigal). By this means he was soon followed by people of war, so that
he brought together five hundred good horsemen, assaulted the great and
famous city of _Amitto_;[180] in which fortune was so favourable to him,
that he took it with so much reputation that from that time he had the
support of all those regions. Hence, he thought he should easily be able
to make himself master of the kingdom of Persia, provided his partizans,
who now favoured him so readily, continued to do so. Therefore, having
made of them a large army, he took the field with the intention, if
Giausa[181] opposed him, of trying the fortune of battle. Giausa, who
had been half apprehensive of the designs of his brother[182] hearing
of the assault and capture of Amitto,[183] did not think it politic to
keep himself aloof and so allow Ussun Cassano to increase in power and
also to repair the other disadvantages, which usually follow in the
course of war. Therefore, having levied an army, he advanced, with almost
all the forces of Persia, against Ussun Cassano. At this juncture, some
Persian lords, who were friends of both, knowing what desolation would
follow in Persia if they came to blows, thrust themselves between the
brothers, and would have brought, with much difficulty, matters to a
good understanding, if it had not been that Giausa, demanding a tribute
of three hundred boy slaves from Ussun Cassano, and the latter not
being willing to consent to it, proved the cause of all proposals of
reconciliation being broken off. As he said, “Have I command over the
sons of my vassals, that I should pay them as a tribute to Giausa; or can
I forsooth dispose of them as my own? If Giausa wished to take them by
force of arms from the hands of their fathers and mothers, I should never
consent to it, even if I were certain of losing my life, as it is equally
enjoined on the Prince to defend his people, as on the people to obey; it
is not now to be thought of, that I should give them of free will.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account