Travels to Tana and Persia : $b A narrative of Italian travels in Persia, in the 15th and 16th centuriesBarbaro, Giosofat
History
Travels to Tana and Persia : $b A narrative of Italian travels in Persia, in the 15th and 16th centuries
Barbaro, Giosofat
Iran -- Description and travel; Voyages and travels
And a short time after there broke out a fierce war with the
above-mentioned Tartar Lasilbas, from a certain ambition and rivalry
which existed between them; when Lasilbas came with a great army against
the Suffaveans, and, joining in a fierce and sanguinary contest,[322]
bore himself as a valiant man for many hours; nevertheless, the forces of
the enemy prevailing, he was repulsed and routed, and saved[323] himself
by flight to Samarcant.
This victory was the most illustrious that Ismail ever obtained, as he
fought against enemies who were great warriors and famous in all the
East. For this reason the Turk and the Soldan became greatly apprehensive
of the power of Ismail, both considering, that if after all the Tartar
happened to be conquered, the road would be opened for Ismail to acquire
Asia and Egypt, as in all the East there were no princes more powerful
than they, but the Tartar Lasilbas.
On this account Selim, the Grand Turk, having heard that Ismail was
engaged with the war waged against the city of Samarcant,[324] which was
the largest in the possession of the Tartar prince, brought together an
immense army of Turks, and advanced in person against Persia, in the year
1514; he marched towards the river of Sivas,[325] which is six hundred
miles distant from Constantinople and six hundred and forty from Tauris:
so that one may say that it is about half way between the two cities, and
having passed the river Lai,[326] he marched forward quickly through the
country of Arsenga.[327] Ismail, who was in Tauris without his regular
troops, who were engaged in besieging Samarcant, hearing of this, began
to levy other forces in haste, and having collected a tolerably good
army placed it under two of his most valiant captains, one named Stàcàlu
Amarbei and the other Aurbec Samper, and sent them against Selim, in
order, by skirmishing, to retard his advance until he had assembled
sufficient men to oppose his enemy openly in the field. This army
consisted of fifteen thousand horsemen, all good soldiers, and, so to
speak, the flower of the Persian people, as the kings of Persia are not
accustomed to give pay on the occasion of war, but to a standing force,
which is called the “porta” of the king. Thus it is that the Persian
gentlemen, to be well brought up, pay great attention to horsemanship,
and when necessity calls, go willingly to war, and bring with them,
according to their means, a certain number of servants as well armed and
mounted as themselves; nevertheless, they do not come out except for the
defence of the country; so that, if the Persian soldiery were paid, as is
the Turkish, there is no doubt but that it would be far superior to that
of the Ottoman princes. This thing has been observed by all those who
have had anything to do with both these nations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account