Treatise on Poisons: In relation to medical jurisprudence, physiology, and the practice of physicChristison, Robert, Sir
Science
Treatise on Poisons: In relation to medical jurisprudence, physiology, and the practice of physic
Christison, Robert, Sir
Medical jurisprudence; Toxicology
The first difference is, that in cholera the sense of acridity in the
throat does not precede the vomiting, as it sometimes does in poisoning.
In cholera this sensation is caused by the vomited matter irritating the
throat, or perhaps by the irritation in the stomach being propagated
upwards by continuity of surface. But, whatever may be its cause, it is
certain that the sense of acridity or burning sometimes remarked in
cholera never begins before the vomiting. In many cases of poisoning,
though certainly not in all, it is the first symptom.—The next
difference is, that in cholera the vomiting is never bloody. I have been
at some pains to investigate this point: and I have been unable to find
any instance of the cholera of this country, which has been accompanied
with sanguinolent vomiting; neither is such a symptom mentioned in any
accounts I have read of malignant cholera. This article of diagnosis
will, of course, be open to correction from the experience of other
practitioners. Lastly, a material difference is, that the simple cholera
of this country very seldom proves fatal so rapidly as poisoning with
the irritants usually does. Death from irritant poisoning is on the
whole seldom delayed beyond two days and a half, and frequently happens
within thirty-six hours, sometimes within six hours, or even less.
Malignant cholera frequently proves fatal in as short a time; but with
regard to the cholera of this country, I believe it may be laid down as
a rule hitherto unshaken by all the controversy to which the subject has
given rise,—that death is not often caused by it at all, and that death
within three days is very rare indeed. A few cases of death within that
period, nay, even within twelve hours, have certainly occurred; but
their great rarity is obvious from the fact, that many practitioners of
experience have not met with a single instance, and others with only one
case in the course of a long practice. Dr. Duncan, senior, mentioned to
me a case, the only one of the kind he had met with, which commenced
soon after the individual ate a sour orange in the Edinburgh theatre,
and which proved fatal in twelve hours. Dr. Duncan, junior, also met
with a single case, which was the instance already noticed of cholera
produced by drinking cold water. Dr. Abercrombie also once, and once
only, met with a case fatal within two days.[161] Mr. Tatham, a late
writer on this subject, met with an instance which proved fatal in
twelve hours.[162] Dr. Burne of London has likewise related an instance
of death within fifteen hours occurring in a child.[163] And I was
informed in 1831 of a case at Leith which ended fatally in twenty-six
hours, and was at first supposed by the unprofessional inhabitants of
the place to be an instance of epidemic or malignant cholera. My
colleagues, Drs. Home, Alison, and Graham, never met with an instance
fatal in so short a time as two or three days; at a meeting of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account