Treatise on Poisons: In relation to medical jurisprudence, physiology, and the practice of physicChristison, Robert, Sir
Science
Treatise on Poisons: In relation to medical jurisprudence, physiology, and the practice of physic
Christison, Robert, Sir
Medical jurisprudence; Toxicology
8. _Of Inflammation of the Stomach._—Chronic inflammation of the stomach
is a common disease; which, however, on account of the slowness of its
course, is not liable to be confounded with the ordinary effects of
irritant poisons. Acute inflammation, on the contrary, follows precisely
the same course as that of irritant poisoning. But great doubts may be
entertained whether true acute gastritis ever exists in this country as
a natural disease. Several of my acquaintances, long in extensive
practice, have stated to me, that their experience coincides entirely
with that of Dr. Abercrombie, who observes he has “never seen a case
which he could consider as being of that nature.”[167] An important
observation of the same purport has been made by M. Louis, one of the
most experienced and accurate pathologists of the present time. He says,
that during six years’ service at the hospital of La Charité, during
which he noticed the particulars of 3000 cases and 500 dissections, he
did not meet with a single instance of fatal primary gastritis. The
disease only occurred as a secondary affection or complicating some
other disease which was the cause of death.[168] So far as I have
hitherto been able to inquire among systematic authors, the descriptions
of idiopathic acute gastritis appear to have been taken from the
varieties caused by poison.
The following are the only specific accounts I have hitherto met with of
an affection of the nature of idiopathic acute gastritis; and the reader
will be at no loss to perceive that in each of them it admits of being
viewed differently. The first two are the cases of inflammation referred
by Haller and Guérard to drinking cold water incautiously [p. 100]. The
next is a remarkable incident related by Lecat, and occurring in 1763. A
girl, nineteen years old, was attacked while in good health with
shivering, faintness, acute pain in the belly, cold extremities and
imperceptible pulse; and she died in sixteen hours. The stomach was
found red, and checkered with brownish patches and gangrenous pustules
(probably warty black extravasation): yet it was supposed to have been
ascertained that she had not taken any thing deleterious.[169] This
narrative is certainly to appearance pointed. But when it is added, that
the girl’s mother was attacked about the same time with precisely the
same symptoms and died in four hours, I think the reader, when he also
considers the imperfect mode in which chemical inquiries were then
conducted, will by no means rest satisfied with Lecat’s assurance that
nothing deleterious was swallowed. The last is an equally singular case
given by Dr. Hastings, of Worcester, where poisoning with cantharides
was suspected. A young lady, liable to indigestion, but at the moment in
better health than usual, was attacked with sickness before breakfast
and after it with vomiting. Three days elapsed before she was seen by
her medical attendant, who found her sinking under incessant vomiting,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account