"And very laudable of him to do so," spoke up the lawyer. "But I have a
serious question to put to you now, Mr. Apperley; be so good as to
attend to me, and speak up. Did not Jim Sanders distinctly tell you that
it was Rupert Trevlyn who had fired the rick?"
Mr. Apperley paused in indecision. On the one hand, he was a plain,
straightforward, honest man, possessing little tact, no cunning; on the
other, he shrank from harming Rupert. Nora's words had left a strong
impression upon him, and the mysterious absence of Jim Sanders was also
producing its effect, as it was on three-parts of the people in court.
He and they were beginning to ask why Jim should run away unless he had
been guilty.
"Have you lost your voice, Mr. Apperley?" resumed the lawyer. "Did or
did not Jim Sanders say it was Rupert Trevlyn who fired the rick?"
"I cannot say but he did," replied Mr. Apperley, as an unpleasant
remembrance came across him that he had proclaimed this fact the
previous night to as many as chose to listen, to which incaution Mr.
Flood no doubt owed his knowledge. "But Jim appeared so flustered and
wild," he continued, "that my belief is--and I have said this
before--that he didn't rightly know what he was saying."
"Unless I am misinformed, you had just before met Rupert Trevlyn,"
continued Mr. Flood. "_He_ was wild and flustered, was he not?"
"He was."
"Were both coming from the same direction?"
"Yes. As if they had run straight from the Hold."
"From the rick-yard, eh?"
"It might be that they had; 'twas pretty straight, if they leaped a
hedge or two."
"Just so. You were walking soberly along the high-road, on your way to
Bluck the farrier's, when you were startled by the apparition of Rupert
Trevlyn flying from the direction of the rick-yard like a wild animal--I
only quote your own account of the fact, Mr. Apperley. Rupert was pale
and breathless; in short, as you described him, he must have been under
the influence of some great terror, or _guilt_. Was this so? Tell their
worships."
"It was so," replied Mr. Apperley.
"You tried to stop him, and you could not; and as you stood looking
after him, wondering whether he was mad, and, if not mad, what could
have put him into such a state, Jim Sanders came up and told you a piece
of news that was sufficient to account for any amount of
agitation--namely, that Rupert Trevlyn had just set fire to one of the
ricks in the yard at the Hold."
It was utterly impossible that Mr. Apperley in his truth could deny
this, and a faint cry broke from the lips of Mrs. Chattaway. But when
Mr. Flood had done with the farmer, it was Mr. Peterby's turn to
question him. He had not much to ask him, but elicited the positive
avowal--and the farmer seemed willing to make as much of it as did Mr.
Peterby--that Jim Sanders was in as great a state of agitation as Rupert
Trevlyn, or nearly so. He, Mr. Apperley, summed up the fact by certain
effective words.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account