But attend to what follows. Early the next morning, Brodie sends for
Robert Smith, his foreman, and asks him if he had heard any news
concerning them; he tells Brodie that Smith, the pannel, and Ainslie
were in prison, and so forth, and adds that he hoped his master was not
concerned with them. Gentlemen, he knew that Smith and Ainslie were Mr.
Brodie’s companions; and you cannot conceive that he would have presumed
to put such a question to his master if he had not been convinced in his
own mind of his master’s guilt. Mr. Brodie makes no answer to this
question. Will it be said that a man conscious of his own innocence
would have remained silent upon such an occasion? Gentlemen, I appeal to
yourselves; how would any one of you have felt, or what answer would you
have returned to a servant who dared put such a question to you?
Brodie at this time tells Smith that he is going out of town for a few
days; but you have it in evidence that he left this country, and fled to
Flushing. In order to account for this flight you are told a story of a
prosecution against him, at the instance of a chimney-sweep, for using
false or loaded dice. This is a very strange circumstance to bring in
exculpation. I have no hesitation to say that it is the most
ignominious defence I ever remember to have heard maintained by a
prisoner at that bar; but you cannot believe that that prosecution was
the occasion of his flight. He was in no greater danger from it then
than he had been in for months before; no step had been taken in that
process which could alarm him at this critical time; and it is mere
mockery, it is altogether a joke, to pretend that from such a
circumstance the prisoner at the bar could have taken up the resolution
of banishing himself from his country for ever.
Besides, Mr. Brodie, in his declaration before the Sheriff, did not
assign this as the cause of his flight. He said that, as he was intimate
with Smith and Ainslie, he was afraid they would accuse him of being
concerned with them in robbing the Excise Office. He did not so much as
mention the defence now set up for him; but his counsel saw that it
would be necessary to account for his conduct in some shape or other,
and no other appearance of defence occurred but this process. It is
impossible to believe this story; and indeed it is impossible to assign
any cause for Mr. Brodie’s conduct consistent with his innocence of the
crime charged against him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account