From Mr. Brodie’s house in Brodie’s Close, Lawnmarket, to Bunker’s Hill,
is above half-a-mile, and Mr. Sheriff was home some minutes before eight
o’clock.--_Creech_.
NOTE 17, page 161.
Peggy Giles, Jean Watt’s servant, said Mr. Brodie was in her mistress’s
house on Thursday afternoon; but this may have been between two and
three o’clock, which she called afternoon, in the same way as Smith’s
maid said that the first meeting in her master’s was on the Wednesday
afternoon, which, by Brown’s evidence, is fixed to have been before
three o’clock.--_Creech._
NOTE 18, page 161.
A report having been circulated that Mr. Brodie was married to this
witness in prison--which, if true, would have disqualified her from
being a witness--it seems to have been the object of the Lord Advocate’s
questions to ascertain the fact.--_Creech._
NOTE 19, page 162.
The Tron Church is near a quarter of a mile from the Parliament
Close.--_Creech._
NOTE 20, page 163.
This is inconsistent with Jean Watt’s evidence, as she said that Mr.
Brodie was not in her house at all on Thursday, and not till
Saturday.--_Creech._
NOTE 21, page 178.
This doctrine, which had been suppressed in Scotland for above a
century, was revived in the course of the memorable trial of Carnegie of
Finhaven by the late Lord Arniston, the illustrious grandfather of the
present Mr. Solicitor Dundas. Mr. Arnot, speaking of his address to the
jury on that occasion, says, “He told them with a manly confidence,
which conscious right inspired, that they must not be startled at the
interlocutor of the Court.” And they were not startled; for although the
facts found relevant to infer a capital punishment were clearly proved,
the jury returned a verdict finding the pannel not guilty, because they
were of opinion that the interlocutor pronounced by the Court on the
relevancy was erroneous.--_Morrison._
NOTE 22, page 182.
Old Norval’s speech in “Douglas.”--_Creech._
NOTE 23, page 183.
The particulars of this story are as follows:--Major had won a
considerable sum of money the night before, and insuch a manner as to
lead to suspicion; two gentlemen, therefore, were determined to watch
him, and for this purpose planted themselves the next night on each side
of his chair, when, taking a proper opportunity, one of them seized his
hand with the dice in it; he grasped it close, and would not part with
them; the other, seeing this, knocked him down, and in the fall the
Major drew with him the first gentleman, who, however, would not let go
his hold till he wrested the dice from him.
He then presented them to the company, who instantly saw and
acknowledged the deceit. The Major was attempting some apology; the
company would hear nothing, but turned him out of the room with every
mark of disgrace and reprobation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive