Unto the Right Honourable the Sheriff-Depute of the County of Edinburgh,
or his Substitute,
The PETITION of JOHN and ANDREW BRUCE, Merchants in
Edinburgh.
HUMBLY SHEWETH,
That on the night betwixt the 24th and 25th days of December 1786, the
petitioners shop, at the head of Bridge Street, was broke into, and
several gold watches, seals, rings, and other articles, were carried
off, to the value of about £350 Sterling. The petitioners applied to the
Procurator Fiscal upon this occasion, who assured them that every step
should be taken to endeavour to find out the persons who had robbed them
of their property.
No intelligence, however, could be got respecting this business till the
beginning of March last, when Brown gave information of him and his
associates, Smith, Ainslie, and Brodie, being the persons who had
committed so many offences of that kind; and, accordingly, the
Procurator-Fiscal presented a petition to your Lordship, stating the
fact of the petitioners’ shop being broke, and referring to a list of
articles stolen therefrom; and that there was reason to believe that
Smith and Ainslie were the persons guilty of that crime, upon which they
were apprehended, and incarcerated in the Tolbooth of Edinburgh, where
they have remained ever since; and Smith and Brodie are now indicted to
be tried for certain crimes, other than that of breaking the
petitioners’ shop.
When the petitioners learned that no notice of their shop was taken in
the indictment, they applied to the Procurator-Fiscal to know what facts
had come out in the precognition regarding the breaking of their shop,
when he informed them that not a word respecting their shop had been
taken down in the precognition, though he admitted, when Smith was
examined before your Lordship, he had acknowledged the fact that he was
the person who had broke the petitioners’ shop, with the knowledge, and
by the advice of Brodie: That Brodie had actually got part of the
articles stolen therefrom, particularly some gold seals, and a gold
watch-key, and some rings.
In these circumstances the petitioners were at a loss to know how to
conduct themselves, in order still to get an examination of Smith,
Brodie, and their associates, as there might be some difficulty in the
matter, now that Smith and Brodie were indicted. However, as they are
indicted for other crimes, the petitioners took the liberty of stating
the matter in a memorial to His Majesty’s advocate who is of opinion
that Smith, Brodie, and all others concerned, or suspected, might still
be examined with regard to the breaking into the petitioners’ shop; and
desired that the present application might be made to your Lordship for
that purpose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive