Brown and Mr. Ainslie soon thereafter,
with an intention, as they first said, to go to bed. I think they said
afterwards that they were going to play cards with Mr. Maclean. My
master, George Smith, did not go out again that night.
Cross-examined by the DEAN OF FACULTY, for Brodie--You have mentioned
that Brown and Ainslie and the prisoners at the bar, when they first
met, were a considerable while together. In what manner were they
employed?
WITNESS--I was for the most part down below in the back cellar; but they
had some bottles of porter together, and either a cold fowl or some
herrings to eat.
The DEAN OF FACULTY--You have said that Mr. Brodie and Brown and Ainslie
were frequently in your master’s house. What did they do when together;
did you ever see them play at any game--at cards or at dice?
WITNESS--I have often seen them play both at cards and at dice,
sometimes in the kitchen and at others in the room above-stairs, but
chiefly at dice, when Mr. Brodie was present.
The LORD JUSTICE-CLERK--My Lord Advocate, is the witness now at liberty?
I understand she has been detained in prison for some time past?
The LORD ADVOCATE--There is no reason for detaining her any longer; she
was only confined until her evidence should be given in this trial.
The LORD JUSTICE-CLERK--Grahame Campbell, you are now at your liberty.
[Sidenote: Mary Hubbart or Hubburt]
18. MARY HUBBART or HUBBURT was then called.
Mr. JOHN CLERK, for Smith--My Lords, the witness now called is the wife
of George Smith, the pannel at the bar, and therefore I object to her
evidence being taken in this trial.
The LORD ADVOCATE--My Lords, I certainly do not intend to examine this
witness as to any particular that relates to the conduct of her husband,
but I conceive that she is an unexceptionable witness against the other
pannel, Mr. Brodie, and that I am entitled to examine her as to him, if
I keep clear of any question that has a tendency to bring out the guilt
of her husband.
Mr. JOHN CLERK--My Lords, I desire your particular attention to this,
that the two pannels are joined together in one indictment, that they
are charged with being guilty of the same crime; and that they are in
every respect in the same circumstances. I have no conception, my Lords,
of any question tending to the crimination of Mr. Brodie that will not
at the same time bring out the guilt of Mr. Smith.
The LORD ADVOCATE--My Lords, that I may remove all apprehensions
concerning the questions I mean to put, I shall only ask the witness
whether Mr. Brodie was in her house on Wednesday, the 5th of March last;
when he came there; and in what manner he was then dressed?
Lord HAILES--My Lords, it is clear that this woman cannot be examined as
a witness against her husband; but at the same time, although her
husband and Brodie are here tried upon one indictment, I see nothing to
prevent my Lord Advocate from putting such questions to her as do not
affect her own husband, but only the other pannel.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account