Cook, John Parsons, -1855; Palmer, William, 1824-1856 -- Trials, litigation, etc.; Trials (Murder) -- England -- London
What was the matter with the child?--I saw it in good health half an
hour before the attack came on. It had an attack of convulsions and
opisthotonos. I rode away from the house, and they supposed I had not
gone a couple of miles when it died.
[Sidenote: W. M‘Donnell]
It was seized with a fit?--Apparently a spasm, which I consider to be of
the tetaniform character. I had seen the child half an hour before.
There was nothing the matter with it then. It was in bed, I believe,
with the mother, who was laid up. I did not see its face. I saw it lying
in bed, but did not examine it. I judged it to be asleep.
With regard to the animals that you experimented on with strychnia, when
did you begin with them?--I began this series of experiments for this
case in January.
Had you ever made any before?--Yes; I think eight or ten years ago. The
dose by which I killed the animals was from 1¾ to 2 grains. The animals
experimented upon were dogs, cats, rabbits, and fowls. These experiments
will relate to dogs. A grain is the smallest dose I administered. In
four cases I used a grain, in five 1½ grains, in one, I think, 1¼
grains, and in two 2 grains.
You never tried them with half a grain?--Yes, I did; I did not mention
it before. I gave half a grain for the purpose of ascertaining the least
dose that would kill.
Did you try if you could detect it afterwards?--How could I try before I
killed the dog?
Do you mean on your oath you do not understand my question? Show me one
instance where you have given half a grain?--I did not make a note,
because it did not kill. I have never destroyed a dog with half a grain;
I tried it, and it did not answer.
Now let us come to your symptoms. You say you have always found the
brain highly congested?--By the stoppage of the circulation in the
system.
Have you not found in some cases that the brain was not congested?--No;
I think in every case there were more or less congestion.
Is that greater in proportion to the length of the paroxysm?--No; it is
greatest where the animal was young and in a full state of health.
Have you ever seen any case of traumatic tetanus?--I think two in my own
practice, but I have seen a few others in hospital.
Have you ever seen a case of strychnia in the human subject?--No, I have
not.
I understand you to say that, in your opinion, this was a case of
epilepsy with tetanic complications?--As far as I can judge from hearing
the evidence in Court.
What does epilepsy proceed from?--Nobody can answer that question.
You have no theory upon the subject?--I have not exactly arrived at any
distinct theory, not quite as distinct as strychnia or tetanus. I have
seen one case of death from epilepsy. The patient was not conscious when
he died.
Can you find me any case in which consciousness has preceded death?--I
cannot recollect.
[Sidenote: W. M‘Donnell]
You have studied on purpose for these cases?--No; I am pretty well up in
most branches.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account