Cook, John Parsons, -1855; Palmer, William, 1824-1856 -- Trials, litigation, etc.; Trials (Murder) -- England -- London
Re-examined by Mr. SERJEANT SHEE--You stated that, though you had seen
no case of epileptic convulsions with tetanic complications, your
reading informed you that there had been, and you mentioned Dr. Mason
Goode?--Yes. He is a well-known author on the subject of convulsions.
There is a class of convulsions called epileptic--not, strictly
speaking, epilepsy--though they resemble it in some of its features.
Epilepsy, properly so called, is sudden in its attacks. The patient
falls down at once with a shriek. Within my knowledge, the disease
constantly occurs at night and in bed.
Are the convulsions which the authors do not class as properly epilepsy,
but as convulsions of an epileptic character, sometimes attended with
premonitory symptoms?--Sometimes the patient is thrown into tetanic and
tetaniform convulsions. Pending the struggle or the convulsions, actual
epilepsy may come on in this way, and the patient die. In epilepsy and
in convulsions of an epileptic character, a patient may have suffered in
the night and be well the next morning, and as well the next day as if
he had had no fit at all, more especially where adults are seized for
the first time. When an adult is seized for the first time it is in my
experience that several fits follow each other during a short period.
If it were true that Cook’s mind appeared distressed and irritable the
afternoon before he died, would you infer from that, considering the
former excitement and elation, he was in a state of depression or
not?--Yes.
What would you infer from what happened in the middle of the Sunday
night, supposing it were true that he represented himself to be mad for
ten minutes, and it was occasioned by a quarrel in the streets?--That he
had been seized with some sudden cramp or spasm.
[Sidenote: W. M‘Donnell]
Supposing there was no such cramp, and that he meant to tell the truth,
would you refer what he said to any nervous and mental excitement?--Yes,
decidedly.
With regard to the spots on the stomach, which you mentioned when my
friend was examining you, you stated you differed from some gentlemen of
your profession?--Yes.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL--He said he did not believe them?--I did not. I did
not believe that inflammation could be absent and these spots present.
Re-examination resumed--Have you known any serious consequence of a
convulsive character reasonably imputed to spots of that description?--I
have. There was a case about twenty years ago. It was published. I saw a
case myself, about eighteen months ago. I examined the body after death.
It was a case of fever, I thought. I did not know what the spots were,
and consulted all the authors who had treated on the mucous structure of
the stomach, and could find no account of it but in one which I have
here, an essay by Dr. Sproshoid, a medical man practising in Edinburgh,
but now deceased.
* * * * *
[Sidenote: J. N. Bainbridge]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account