Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
The prosecution in this case shall have occasion to introduce in
evidence documents processed under the direction of Major Coogan. Some
of these documents were introduced in evidence before the IMT and some
were not. As to those which were, this Tribunal is required by Article
XX of Ordinance No. 7 to take judicial notice thereof. However, in order
to simplify the procedure, we will introduce photostatic copies of
documents used in Case No. 1 before the IMT to which will be attached a
certificate by Mr. Fred Niebergall, the Chief of our Document Control
Branch, certifying that such document was introduced in evidence before
the IMT and that the photostat is a true and correct copy thereof. Such
documents have been and will be made available to defendants just as in
the case of any other document.
As to those documents processed under the direction of Major Coogan
which were not used in the case before the IMT, they are authenticated
by the affidavit of Major Coogan dated 19 November 1945. This affidavit
served as the basis of authentication of substantially all documents
used by the Office of Chief of Counsel before the IMT. It was introduced
in that trial as USA Exhibit 1. Since we will use certain documents
processed for the IMT trial, I would now like to introduce as
Prosecution Exhibit 1 the Coogan affidavit,[14] in order to authenticate
such documents. This affidavit explains the manner in and means by which
captured German documents were processed for use in war crimes trials. I
shall not burden the court with reading it as it is substantially the
same as the affidavit of Mr. Niebergall to which I shall come in a
moment.
I have thus far explained the manner of authenticating documents to be
used in this case which were processed under the direction of Major
Coogan. I now come to the authentication of documents processed not for
the IMT trial, but for subsequent trials such as this one. These
documents are authenticated by the affidavit of Mr. Niebergall which I
offer in evidence as Prosecution Exhibit 2. Since this affidavit
explains the procedure of processing documents by the Office of Chief of
Counsel for War Crimes, I shall read it in full:
“I, Fred Niebergall, AGO, D-150636, of the Office of Chief of
Counsel for War Crimes, do hereby certify as follows:
1. I was appointed Chief of the Document Control Branch,
Evidence Division, Office of Chief of Counsel for War Crimes
(hereinafter referred to as ‘OCC’) on 2 October 1946.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account