Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
The English document books will contain certified translations of the
documents in the German document books. The documents will be numbered
and indexed identically in both the English and German versions. The
Defendants’ Information Center will receive four copies of the English
document books at the same time the corresponding German document book
is delivered. A representative group of the defense attorneys have
agreed that four of the English document books are sufficient to meet
their needs.
The Tribunal will receive six English document books and sufficient
copies will also be made available to the interpreters and court
reporters. Copies of all documents introduced in evidence will
thereafter be made available to the press.
The prosecution will sometimes have occasion to use documents which have
just been discovered and are not in document books. In such cases we
will try to have copies in the Defendants’ Information Center a
reasonable time in advance of their use in court. Now, I must point out
to your Honors, and I do so without any embarrassment, that there will
surely be some instances during the course of this trial when the
prosecution fails to comply with one or the other of the court’s rulings
in view of the fact that few of our personnel here were able to obtain
experience and training in the technicalities in the course of Case No.
1 before the International Military Tribunal, but be that as it may, we
shall constantly endeavor to present our case as fairly, as clearly, and
as expeditiously as is humanly possible.
The prosecution, when presenting a document in Court, will physically
hand the original, or the certified photostatic copy serving as the
original, to the clerk of the Tribunal, and give the document a
prosecution exhibit number.
In the IMT trial, the usual practice, to which there were many
exceptions, was that only those documents or portions of documents which
had been read aloud in Court were considered to be in evidence and part
of the record. Now this was due to the fact that the IMT trial was
conducted in four languages and only through that method were
translations in all four languages ordinarily available. However, the
IMT ruled several times, for example on 17 December 1945, that documents
which had been translated into all four languages and made available to
defense counsel in the Defendants’ Information Center were admissible in
evidence without being read in full.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account