Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Therefore, I commission the Reich Marshal Hermann Goering to establish
as an independent entity a Reich Research Council, which is to serve
this purpose, to take over its chairmanship himself and to give it a
charter.
Leading men of science above all are to make research fruitful for
warfare by working together in their special fields. The hitherto
existing Reich Research Council which was under the Reich Minister for
Science and Education [Wissenschaft, Erziehung und Volksbildung] is to
be absorbed by the new organization.
The means needed for research purposes are to be established in the
Reich budget as far as they will not be raised from contributions (for
research) of circles interested in research.
Fuehrer Headquarters, 9 June 1942
The Fuehrer
ADOLF HITLER
The Reich Minister and Chief of the Reich Chancellery
DR. LAMMERS
TRANSLATION OF DOCUMENT NO-645
PROSECUTION EXHIBIT 3
[Illustration: Table of Organization of the Reich Commissioner for
Health and Medical Service, drawn by the defendant Karl Brandt]
-----
[15] To Wehrmacht in this connection belong: Army, Navy, Luftwaffe, the
Waffen SS units under orders of the Wehrmacht and the organizations and
services engaged within the framework of the Wehrmacht. [Footnote in
original document.]
[16] Same as Footnote 15 above.
[17] As to the Navy these rules will not apply or will apply with
restrictions only to personnel _on board_. [Footnote in original
document.]
VII. EXTRACTS FROM ARGUMENTATION AND EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION AND DEFENSE
A. Medical Experiments
1. HIGH-ALTITUDE EXPERIMENTS
a. Introduction
The defendants Karl Brandt, Handloser, Schroeder, Gebhardt, Rudolf
Brandt, Mrugowsky, Poppendick, Sievers, Ruff, Romberg, Becker-Freyseng,
and Weltz were charged with special responsibility for and participation
in criminal conduct involving high-altitude experiments (par. 6 (_A_) of
the indictment). During the course of the trial, the prosecution
withdrew this charge in the cases of Karl Brandt, Handloser, Poppendick,
and Mrugowsky. Only the defendants Rudolf Brandt and Sievers were
convicted on this charge.
The prosecution’s summation of the evidence on the high-altitude
experiments is contained in its closing brief against the defendants
Ruff, Romberg, and Weltz. An extract from this brief is set forth below
on pages 92 to 113. A corresponding summation of the evidence by the
defense on these experiments has been selected from the closing briefs
for the defendants Ruff and Sievers. It appears below on pages 114 to
140. This argumentation is followed by selections from the evidence on
pages 140 to 198.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account