Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
The memorandum of Nini Rascher to Himmler of 24 February 1942 shows that
at that time Rascher was still subordinate to Weltz. (_NO-263, Pros. Ex.
47._) She reviewed the history of the experiments and pointed out that
on 24 July 1941 Rascher, Kottenhoff, and Weltz were to be in charge.
Kottenhoff was transferred to Romania in August and thereby excluded
from the group. She stated that it was Weltz’s task to initiate the
technical execution of the experiments. Apparently because of a fear of
moral objections on the part of Hippke, Weltz had postponed the
beginning of the experiments but had finally secured Ruff and Romberg to
collaborate with Rascher. A conference took place in Dachau between
Piorkowski, Schnitzler, Weltz, Rascher, Romberg, and Ruff. Weltz had
given the assurance that he would take care of the authorization for
Rascher. Mrs. Rascher complained that on 18 February, after Rascher had
carried out all the preparatory work, Weltz stated: “Now that you have
removed all obstacles from the path of Romberg with the SS, the
authorization must be handled differently.” Mrs. Rascher stated that
both Romberg and Rascher agreed that Weltz was not needed anymore and
that both opposed his attempts to oust Rascher in favor of himself.
Weltz contended that the truth of the matter was that he wished to get
rid of Rascher, and that Mrs. Rascher had misrepresented this to Himmler
so that it would appear that he was trying to eliminate Rascher in order
to keep the work exclusively to himself. (_Tr. p. 7099._) There can be
no question that Mrs. Rascher was quite correct in her analysis of the
situation. What possible reason could Weltz have for desiring, just
before the experiments began, to eliminate Rascher unless he wished to
participate himself personally and thus secure a larger share of the
scientific credit? Certainly he had supported Rascher from the very
inception of the proposal to perform the experiments. Be that as it may,
the proof shows that Rascher continued to participate in the experiments
as a subordinate of Weltz. This is clearly proved by a file memorandum
of Schnitzler of the SS office in Munich, dated 28 April 1942. (_NO-264,
Pros. Ex. 60._) This memorandum shows that Rascher was still
subordinated to Weltz, and that Weltz was insisting on active
participation in the experiments and full responsibility. The RLM [Reich
Air Ministry] had inquired of Weltz how long the experiments would last,
and whether it was justifiable to detail a medical officer for so long.
Rascher, who was chafing under his subordination to Weltz, requested
that his assignment be changed to the DVL [German Aviation Research
Institute], Dachau Branch.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account