Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
“In reference to your telegram of 12 May our medical inspector
reports to me that the altitude experiments carried out by the
SS and Air Force at Dachau have been finished. Any continuation
of these experiments seems essentially unreasonable. However,
the carrying out of experiments of some other kind, in regard to
perils at high sea, would be important. These have been prepared
in immediate agreement with the proper offices; Major (M. C.)
Weltz will be charged with the execution and Captain (M. C.)
Rascher will be made available until further orders in addition
to his duties within the Medical Corps of the Air Corps.”
(_343-A-PS, Pros. Ex. 62._)
Thus it is clear that Weltz must be held responsible for the numerous
murders which resulted during the high-altitude experiments in Dachau.
Not only did he participate in plans and enterprises involving the
commission of these experiments, but he also was the direct superior of
Rascher who, together with Ruff and Romberg, actually executed the
experiments.
_Status of Prisoners Used in the Experiments_
After Weltz had successfully secured the collaboration of Ruff and
Romberg, he held a meeting at his institute in Munich late in December
1941, or early in January 1942. (_Tr. p. 6657_; _Tr. p. 7086_.) Ruff,
Romberg, Weltz, and Rascher attended this meeting primarily to lay the
groundwork for the technical arrangements necessary to perform the work
at Dachau. It is alleged by all the defendants that the question
regarding the status of the prisoners to be used was discussed and that
Rascher had assured them that the subjects would be exclusively
volunteers. (_Tr. p. 7086_; _Tr. p. 6232_; _Tr. p. 6869_.) In fact, the
defendants state that Rascher exhibited a communication from Himmler
which provided that the subjects must be volunteers under all
circumstances. (_Tr. p. 6869._) Unfortunately, this letter has not been
produced by the defense. Needless to say, the defendants take the
position that such experiments were to be performed on habitual and
condemned criminals and that considerations were to be offered to said
“volunteers” in the event of their surviving the experiments. As a
matter of fact, Romberg explicitly states that he saw the “Himmler
letter” and he was able to observe the words “criminal” and “volunteer”
therein. (_Tr. p. 6870._)
The assertion on the part of the defendants that Himmler had ordered
that the criminals used be volunteers is ridiculous and incredible when
one considers that Himmler instructed Rascher to pardon these
unfortunate inmates only if they could be recalled to life after having
been subjected to the type of experiments outlined in Rascher’s first
interim report, wherein it is shown that the experimental subjects had
stopped breathing altogether and their chests had been cut open, i. e.,
autopsy had been actually performed on them. (_1971-A-PS, Pros. Ex.
49._)
In this instance, Himmler graciously stated:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account