Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
The witness Neff’s testimony reveals that approximately 10 prisoners
were selected as permanent, experimental subjects, but they were not
volunteers. (_Tr. pp. 611, 622, and 430._) There were, however, a few
“volunteers” according to Neff. He stated that “there were certain
volunteers for these experiments, because Rascher promised certain
persons that they would be released from the camp if they underwent
these experiments.” (_Tr. p. 614._) Neff clearly pointed out that in
view of the way the prisoner subjects were selected and used it was not
possible to know who were volunteers, if any, and who were not
volunteers. (_Tr. pp. 606-26._) They were not brought in and used as a
separate group. Moreover, the evidence shows that these promises were
not kept. (_Tr. p. 615._) The only evidence of a release is the case of
Sabota, as outlined by Neff, and in that case he was sent to an
undesirable special SS commando group. No death sentences were commuted.
The defense claims for Ruff and Romberg that the experiments at Dachau
were divided into two groups. The first group, the so-called
Ruff-Romberg-Rascher experiments, was noncriminal, while the second
group, the Rascher experiments, encompassed all the crimes. They contend
that the Ruff-Romberg-Rascher experiments were conducted independently
of the Rascher experiments and that the 10 original subjects mentioned
by Neff and Vieweg were used exclusively for the Ruff-Romberg-Rascher
experiments. Despite the testimony of the witnesses and the weight of
the documentary evidence, they would have the Tribunal believe that by a
wondrous working of fate these were all volunteers and no crimes
occurred. This defense is of course inapplicable to Weltz. Rascher was
subordinated to and subject to his orders.
It should be noted that Romberg and Rascher who tested themselves in the
altitude chamber at Dachau with an air pressure equivalent to 12,500 and
13,500 meters altitude respectively, for 30 to 40 minutes, discontinued
these experiments on themselves because of intense pain. (_NO-402, Pros.
Ex. 66._) Yet, these men proceeded, as proved by their own joint report,
to conduct experiments on prisoners which they would not perform on
themselves.
The experimenters took no responsibility or even interest in seeing to
it that the alleged promises made to the subjects to induce them to
“volunteer” were kept. (_Tr. p. 6993._) Although Romberg said he had no
channel to Himmler, he also admitted he visited Himmler with Rascher in
July 1942. (_Tr. pp. 7015-6._)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account